Ditemukan 495 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 30-09-2007 — Putus : 30-10-2007 — Upload : 27-06-2019
Putusan PN BATURAJA Nomor 440/PID.B/2007/PN.BTA
Tanggal 30 Oktober 2007 — - TEGUH KARYA BIN KODIRAN
215
  • penangkapan dan masa penahanan yang telah dijalani terdakwaangkan seluruhnya dari pidana yang dijatuhkan ;ay lembebani terdakwa membayar biaya perkara sebesar Rp.1.000, (Seribu Rupiah) ;Memerintahkan agar barang bukti berupa : satu karung warna putih yang berisikan beras panjang Ciliwung + 50 Kg, satu bilah kayu Ring warna coklat panjang ukuran lebih 50 Cm dikembalikan kepada saksi korban KUD Karya Muda, 1 satu helai baju kaos warna Pink merk DARBOST,DRG alas anlana iaanc vain bitank wxmclke TOW Those
Register : 12-12-2012 — Putus : 14-05-2013 — Upload : 25-03-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 822 B/PK/PJK/2012
Tanggal 14 Mei 2013 — DIRJEN PAJAK VS PT. KIMBERLY - CLARK INDONESIA;
6214 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Royalti, sewa, dan penghasilan lain schubungan dengan penggunaan harta;Bahwa Pasal 7 dan Pasal 12 ayat (2) huruf a dan ayat (3) Perjanjian PajakBerganda Indonesia Australia, menyatakan :Pasal 7The profits of an enterprise of a Contracting State shall be taxable only in thatState unless the enterprise carries on business in the other Contracting Statethrough a permanent establishment situated in that other State.Pasal 12 ayat (2)Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise
    , andaccording to the law of that State, but the tax so charged shall not exceed: (a) inthe case of royalties described in subparagraphs 3(b) and (c), and to the extent towhich they relate to those royalties, in subparagraphs 3(d) and (f) 10%; andPasal 12 ayat (3)The term "royalties" in this Article means payments, whether periodical or not,and however described or computed, to the extent to which they are made asconsideration for:(a) the use of, or the right to use, any copyright, patent, design
    Bahwa Pasal 12 ayat (2) huruf a dan ayat (3) Perjanjian Pajak Berganda IndonesiaAustralia, menyatakan :Pasal 12 ayat (2)Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise, andaccording to the law of that State, but the tax so charged shall not exceed:a in the case of royalties described in subparagraphs 3 (b) and (c), and to theextent to which they relate to those royalties, in subparagraphs 3(d) and (f) 10%; andPasal 12 ayat (3)The term "royalties" in this Article means payments
Putus : 24-06-2015 — Upload : 02-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 90/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 24 Juni 2015 — PT. HYATT INDONESIA vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
7455 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In a narrow range of such cases, an intragroup activity maybe performed relating to group members even though those group members donot need the activity (and would not be willing to pay for it were theyindependent enterprises). Such an activity would be one that a group member(usually the parent company or a regional holding company) performs solelybecause of its ownership interest in one or more other group members, i.e. in itscapacity as shareholder.
    Putusan Nomor 90/B/PK/PJK/2015are derived from sources within such other Contracting State from sales ofgoods or merchandise of the same kind as those sold, or from other businesstransactions of the same kinds as those effected, through the permanentestablishment.Bahwa berdasarkan hal tersebut diatas, jelas bahwa seharusnya jasa yangdilakukan oleh HIC tidak terhutang PPh Pasal 26 karena jasa tersebut dilakukansepenuhnya di Amerika Serikat, dan nyatanyata merupakan jasa dan bukanmerupakan dividen,
Putus : 09-03-2020 — Upload : 06-07-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 525/B/PK/Pjk/2020
Tanggal 9 Maret 2020 — PT QUEEN PACIFIC SUKSESABADI vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI,
6330 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • lain.Berdasarkan identifikasi barang, bahwa barang impor yangdiberitahukan pada pos 15, 16, dan 18 pada PIB nomor 357342 tanggal14 Agustus 2017 diidentifikasi sebagai alas kaki terbuat dari bahanplastik yang bagian atasnya tidak dipasang pada sol dan tidak dirakitdengan cara dijahit, dikeling, dipaku, disekrup, ditusuk atau prosessemacam itu;Berdasarkan General Explanatory Notes Fifth Edition (2012), Chapter64, pada alinea pertama disebutkan sebagai berikut:GENERALWith certain exceptions (see particularly those
    The size of the uppers variesvery much between different types of footwear, from those covering the foot and the wholeleg, including the thigh (for example, fishermens boots), to those which consist simply ofstraps or thongs (for example, sandals). .e.
Putus : 11-12-2019 — Upload : 23-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 4137/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 11 Desember 2019 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
4017 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 4137/B/PK/Pjk/2019GENERALWith certain exceptioms (see particularly those mentioned at the end of this General Note) thisChapter covers, under headings 64.01 to 64.05, various types of footwear (i ncluding Overs oes)irrespective of their shape and size, the particular use for which they are designed, their methodof manufacture or the materials of which they are made.For the purposes of this Chapter, the term footwear does not, however, include cisposable foot orshoe cowverin of flimsy
    The size of the uppers variesvery much between different types of footwear, ftcen those covering the foot and the wholeleg, including the thigh (for ke fishermens boots), to those which consist simply ofstraps or thongs (for example, sandals)If the upper consists of two or more materials, classification is determined by theconstituent material which has the preatert external surface area, no account being taken ofaccessories or reinforcements such as ankle patches, protective or omamenta strips oredging
Register : 12-07-2016 — Putus : 12-01-2017 — Upload : 09-03-2017
Putusan PN MATARAM Nomor 408/Pid.B/2016/PN Mtr
Tanggal 12 Januari 2017 — - Pidana - GUY DAMIAN SOMERS
9343
  • Castaway Life yang diselenggarakan tanggal13 Oktober 2014.Pada tanggal 07 Nopember 2014 di Kantor Anggia Law Office JalanPerungik No. 37 Puncang Hijau Sandik Kecamatan GunungsariKabupaten Lombok Barat, terdakwa menyerahkan Akta TurunanBerita Acara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Luar Biasa PT.Castaway Life Nomor 08 tanggal 16 Oktober 2014 kepada Anggia MLubis Browne sambil berkata lbu....you can use those documentincluding akta RUPS to support your argument for Nadine claim at thecourt to close PT.
    Castaway Life Nomor 08 tanggal16 Oktober 2014 kepada Anggia M Lubis Browne sambil berkataIbu....you can use those document including akta RUPS to support yourargument for Nadine claim at the court to close PT. Castaway Life, yangartinya lbu....kamu bisa pakai dokumendokumen termasuk akta RUPSuntuk mendukung argumen kamu pada tuntutan Nadine di Pengadilanuntuk menutup PT. Castaway Life.
Register : 25-01-2016 — Putus : 22-03-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 92 B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Maret 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS JOB PERTAMINA - TALISMAN (OGAN KOMERING) LTD;
3230 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If the enterprise carries on or has carried on business asaforesaid, the profits of the enterprise may be taxed in the other Statebut only so much of them as is attributable to that permanentestablishment or are derived within such other State from sales ofgoods or merchandise of the same kind as those sold or from otherbusiness transactions of the same kind as those effected, through thepermanent establishmentbahwa berdasarkan ketentuan tersebut, karena biaya overheadkantor pusat terjadi dan dilaksanakan
Putus : 24-06-2015 — Upload : 21-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 89/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 24 Juni 2015 — PT. HYATT INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
23181 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In a narrow range of such cases, an intragroup activity maybe performed relating to group members even though those group members donot need the activity (and would not be willing to pay for it were theyindependent enterprises). Such an activity would be one that a group member(usually the parent company or a regional holding company) performs solelybecause of its ownership interest in one or more other group members, i.e. in itscapacity as shareholder.
    If such resident carries on business as aforesaids, tax may be imposedby that other Contracting State on the business profits of such resident but onlyon so much of such profits as are attributable to the permanent establishment orare derived from sources within such other Contracting State from sales ofgoods or merchandise of the same kind as those sold, or from other businesstransactions of the same kinds as those effected, through the permanentestablishment.bahwa berdasarkan hal tersebut diatas
Register : 23-02-2015 — Putus : 24-06-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 91 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 24 Juni 2015 — PT. HYATT INDONESIA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
67139 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In a narrow range of such cases, an intragroup activity maybe performed relating to group members even though those group members donot need the activity (and would not be willing to pay for it were theyindependent enterprises). Such an activity would be one that a group member(usually the parent company or a regional holding company) performs solelybecause of its ownership interest in one or more other group members, .. in itscapacity as shareholder.
    Putusan Nomor 91/B/PK/PJK/2015are derived from sources within such other Contracting State from sales ofgoods or merchandise of the same kind as those sold, or from other businesstransactions of the same kinds as those effected, through the permanentestablishment;Bahwa berdasarkan hal tersebut di atas, jelas bahwa seharusnya jasa yangdilakukan oleh HIC tidak terutang PPh Pasal 26 karena jasa tersebut dilakukansepenuhnya di Amerika Serikat, dan nyatanyata merupakan jasa dan bukanmerupakan dividen,
Putus : 28-03-2012 — Upload : 03-08-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 87 PK/Pid/2011
Tanggal 28 Maret 2012 — DAMIAN PETER HEALY
2411 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Sungguh dalam ajaran Islamsumpah palsu berkatagori dosa besar yang sangat siksanya di akhiratsebagaimana petunjuk Alquran dalam Surat al Furgon (25) ayat 72 : danOrangorang yang tidak menjadi saksi palsu (arab: walladhinavasyhaduna zura, inggris: those who witness no falsehood ).
Register : 05-04-2013 — Putus : 16-05-2013 — Upload : 30-12-2013
Putusan PA WONOSARI Nomor 438/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Wno
Tanggal 16 Mei 2013 — Pemohon dan Termohon
80
  • permohonan pemohon telah beralasan hukum sesuaipasal 19 Huruf (f) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 Jo pasal 116huruf (f) Inpres Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam, sertapermohonan Pemohon tersebut tidak melawan hak, oleh karenanya petitumyang meminta agar Pemohon diberi izin untuk menjatuhkan talak terhadapTermohon dapat dipertimbangkan) Menimbang, bahwa dalam hal ini Majelis hakim perlu memperhatikan dalil Alqur'anul Karim surat AlBaqarah ayat 227 yang berbunvyi:PYViton I uaa UELS5 those
Putus : 16-06-2016 — Upload : 13-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 500/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 16 Juni 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. GM AUTOWORLD INDONESIA
5628 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If theenterprise carries on business as aforesaid, the income or profits of theenterprise may be taxed in the other State but only so much of them as isattributable to (a) that permanent establishment; (b) sales in that other Stateof goods or merchandise of the same or similar kind as those sold through thepermanent establishment; or (c) other business activities carried on in thatother State of the same or similar kind as those effected through thepermanent establishment."
Register : 03-02-2020 — Putus : 03-03-2020 — Upload : 03-03-2020
Putusan PA SANGATTA Nomor 100/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Sgta
Tanggal 3 Maret 2020 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
157
  • ;SHC FHPArtinya : Tidak boleh memberi madharat dan tidak boleh pula mendatangkanmadharat.Oleh karena itu, perceraian dipandang lebih maslahat bagi kedua belah pihak,sedangkan mempertahankan rumah tangga mereka hanyalah akanmendatangkan kemudharatan baik bagi Penggugat, Tergugat maupun untukanakanak mereka;Menimbang, bahwa dalam perkara aquo dapat juga diterapkan dalilsyari tercantum dalam Kitab Fiqh SunnahJ ilid 2 halaman 291 sebagai berikut:Texted eB ec 7 Wn ase DESH slitABE DUN DSC CAD 6 SRST THOSE
Putus : 20-03-2019 — Upload : 28-05-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 889/B/PK/Pjk/2019
Tanggal 20 Maret 2019 — BUT SALAMANDER ENERGY (GLAGAH KAMBUNA) LIMITED VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
6535 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 889/B/PK/Pjk/2019profits of the permanent establishment after payment of the income taxon those profits;Terjemahan dalam Bahasa Indonesia:(Terlepas dari ketentuanketentuan lainnya dalam Persetujuan ini,apabila suatu) perusahaan yang merupakan penduduk NegaraPenandatanganan Persetujuan memiliki bentuk usaha tetap di Negaralain Penandatanganan Persetujuan ini, memperoleh keuntungan bentukusaha tetap, keuntungan tersebut dapat dikenakan pajak (selain pajakyang dikenakan terhadap keuntungan
Putus : 17-03-2010 — Upload : 20-07-2010
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2558K/PIDSUS/2009
Tanggal 17 Maret 2010 — PENUNTUT UMUM PADA KEJAKSAAN NEGERI TARAKAN ; H. SAHIBUDDIN alias H. SAIPA bin MAKARNU
2012 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Bahwa putusan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Tarakan dan PengadilanTinggi Kalimantan Timur di Samarinda sangat tidak mendukung adanyaperkembangan Tipologi Kejahatan di lingkungan masyarakat bangsaIndonesia yang sedang gjiatgiatnya memberantas Illegal Fishingpenangkapan ikan tanpa ijin dari Pemerintah Negara Indonesia, kategoripenjahat ini selalu melibatkan keahlian di dalam aksinya (those who angageHal. 6 dari 8 hal. Put.
Putus : 05-12-2016 — Upload : 20-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1143/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 5 Desember 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. BANK ANZ INDONESIA,
80159 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If the enterprisecarries on business in that manner, the profits of the enterprisemay be taxed in the other State but only so much of them as isattributable to :(a) That permanent establishment; or(b) Sales in that other State of goods or merchandise of thesame or a similar kind as those sold through that permanentestablishment; orHalaman 19 dari 36 halaman.
    Putusan Nomor 1143/B/PK/PJK/2016(c) Other business activities carried on in that other State of thesame or a similar kind as those carried on through thatpermanent establishment.Article 12:1.Royalties arising in one of the Contracting States, beingroyalties to which a resident of the other Contracting State isbeneficially entitled, may be taxed in that other State.Those royalties may be taxed in the Contracting State inwhich they arise, and according to the law of that State, butthe tax so charged
    furnishing of services", yaitu kegiatan yangdianggap memenuhi kriteria BUT bila telah memenuhi Ujiwaktu.Dalam hal ini imbalan jasa yang diterima termasukpenghasilan dari usaha (business income/businessprofit).Dalam P3B antara Indonesia dengan Australia,pengertian jasa teknik tersebut diatur dalam article 5 (j)the furnishing of services, including consultancyservices, by an enterprise within one of the ContractingStates through employees or other personnel engaged bythe enterprise for that purpose, if those
Putus : 01-01-1970 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 946/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 1 Januari 1970 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK, VS PT COCA COLA INDONESIA
3063072 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Where a resident of one of the Contracting States and anyother person are related and where such related personsmake arrangements or impose conditions betweenthemselves which are different from those which would bemade between independent persons, any income,deductions, credits, or allowances which would, but forthose arrangements or conditions, have been taken intoaccount in computing the income (or loss) of, or the taxpayable by, one of such persons, may be taken into accountin computing the amount
    Where a Contracting State includes in the profits of aresident of that State, and taxes accordingly, profits onwhich a resident of the other Contracting State has beencharged to tax in that other State, and the profits so includedare profits which would have accrued to the resident of thefirstmentioned State if the conditions made between the tworesidents had been those which would have been madebetween independent persons, then that other State shallmake an appropriate adjustment to the amount of
    the taxcharged therein on those profits.
    Insuch a case, it is necessary to determine how themarketer should be compensated for those activities. Theissue is whether the marketer should be compensated asa service provider, .e. for providing promotional services,or whether there are any cases in which the marketershould share in any additional return attributable to themarketing intangibles.
    In that case, the distributorwould be entitled to compensation appropriate to itsagency activities alone and would not be entitled to sharein any return attributable to the marketing intangible.Where the distributor actually bears the cost of itsmarketing activities (i.e. there is no arrangement for theowner to reimburse the expenditures), the issue is theextent to which the distributor is able to share in thepotential benefits from those activities.
Register : 10-11-2014 — Putus : 16-12-2014 — Upload : 05-01-2015
Putusan PA NGANJUK Nomor 2190/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Ngj
Tanggal 16 Desember 2014 —
91
  • 1 THOSE" (3Hot "(# )! $s" 1 # S$ *! )1%S)$#" # *! I" C# #U #THM )G&166 & '#" & &#N *! 'HOSUH" DIL FS HUH STII" #S #SH & it) #% "oe" +6" " #&" 2 #)#S 3 *SS#) S$) St S$ " "!)S# #" S+D& GH" & # S+ & #(# (#5 & &" &!& # #" # (#" )#'S"# #O0# # Of # # )IXL S (#" S# #gl= )! S#* *#)E" #" )&H S S$) ! 8, &) & )IL.#SS'" (# Fo" l! & # # # #" *! )ISS)S# (# Lt CT IeEM EU EU KH # DESH DE 6# #& '! &# .!S# *S#', #5 1 )IEL& )) SEM IM NU KIN EAH KET HE) S# #%# = ' Maidza Hurriyyatuz zaujaeni fii thalaq (#" S# .
Register : 09-10-2013 — Putus : 29-04-2014 — Upload : 27-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.52221/PP/M.VIIB/19/2014
Tanggal 29 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11518
  • sudah tidak menghitung pajak beamasuk impor, karena barang tersebut Pemohon Banding impor ari CHina (adafasilitas Form E/ACFTA).bahwa Pemohon Banding sebagai importir berharap Terbanding dapatmembuktikan secara transparan pembuktiannya dari penerbit Form E tersebutdi atas.bahwa sesuai Appendix I Operational Certification Procedure for the RulesOf Origin, Rule 12 Where the origin of a good is not in doubt, the discoveryof minor discrepancies, between the statements made in a Certificate ofOrigin and those
Register : 02-10-2013 — Putus : 29-04-2014 — Upload : 27-03-2015
Putusan PENGADILAN PAJAK Nomor Put.52220/PP/M.VIIB/19/2014
Tanggal 29 April 2014 — Pemohon Banding dan Terbanding
11620
  • tidak menghitung pajak beamasuk impor, karena barang tersebut Pemohon Banding impor dari China(ada fasilitas Form E/ACFTA),.bahwa Pemohon Banding sebagai importir berharap Terbanding dapatmembuktikan secara transparan pembuktiannya dari penerbit Form E tersebutdi atas.bahwa sesuai Appendix I Operational Certification Procedure for the RulesOf Origin, Rule 12 Where the origin of a good is not in doubt, the discoveryof minor discrepancies, between the statements made in a Certificate ofOrigin and those