Ditemukan 2113 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : watch white whini whim weich wacih whidi wich winch
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Arbitrase
Putus : 05-04-2013 — Upload : 23-01-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 293 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 5 April 2013 — BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI) vs PT. SMG CONSULTANS, yang diwakili oleh Direktur PT. SMG CONSULTANS Kieth Whitchruch
832 — 754 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pdt.Sus/201232Putusan Arbitrase Asing ("Konvensi New York") (bukti P29) mengatur sebagaiberikut:"Article V1 Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused, at the request of theparry against whom it is invoked, onlY if that parry furnishes to the competent authorirywhere the recognition and enforcement is sought, proof that;a The parties to the agreement referred to in article II were, under the lawapplicable to them, under some incapacity, or the said agreement is not valid under thelaw to which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 20-07-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1251/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 20 Juli 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs. PT. DARMA HENWA, Tbk
45 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1251/B/PK/PJK/201 7The American Heritage Dictionary defines a stationwagon as "an automobile with one or more rows offolding or removable seats behind the driver and noluggage compartment but an area behind the seatsinto which suitcases, parcels, etc., can be loadedthrough a tailgate."
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pidana Khusus
Putus : 10-10-2012 — Upload : 12-07-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 154 PK/PID.SUS/2012
Tanggal 10 Oktober 2012 — Ir. FAISAL MUAZ
75 — 53 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Wiratmaja menjelaskan: Forensic Accounting,provides an accounting analysis that is suitable to the court which will formthe basis for discussion, debate and ultimately dispute resolution. ;Selanjutnya, menyangkut Forensic Audit, Wiratmaja menyatakan Anexamination of evidence regarding an assertion to determine itscorrespondence to established criteria carried out in a manner suitable tothe court.
Restatement Bukti Permulaan Yang Cukup
Author : Chandra M Hamzah (Penulis); Hasril Hertanto (Editor); Giri Ahmad Taufik (Peneliti); Gita Putri Damayana (Peneliti); Gusnandi Arief Haliadi (Asisten Peneliti);
Bukti Permulaan yang Cukup
6127 — 3251
  • Perlu adanyasuatu pengaturan yang jelas terkait bagaimana definisi bukti permulaan yang cukup dan bagaimanakah menentukan cukup atau tidaknya buktipermulaan tersebut. KUHAP tidak mensyaratkan berapa banyakbukti yang harus dimiliki ... [Selengkapnya]
  • Echols dan Hassan Shadily, Kamus InggrisIndonesia:An Englishindonesian Dictionary, Op.cit, hal 223.tertulis yang memuat klausulaklausula yang telahditetapkan sebelumnya, digunakan berulangkalidalam suatu kegiatan usaha atau dalam kegiatanindustri tertentu dengan sedikit penambahan atauperubahan yang disesuaikan dengan situasitertentu. 31 Sementara itu, klausula eksemsi atau exemptionclause didefinisikan sebagai a contractual provisionproviding that a party will not be liable for damagesfor which
    Metode pengurangan atau bahkanpenghapusan kewajibankewajiban 2632 Kalimat asli dari paragraf diatas adalah an exemption clausemay take many forms, but all such clauses have one thing incommon in that they exempt a party from a liability which hewould have borne had it not been for the clause.
    Most person have difficult remaining the lasttime they contracted other than standard form".Demikian pula sebagaimana ditegaskan oleh W.Friedmann bahwa "most contract which govern ourdaily lives are standard contracts".5Latar belakang yang mendasari lahirnya klausulabaku adalah efisiensi dan efektifitas dalamberkontrak.>8 Soedjono Dirdjosisworo>?
Pengadilan PN TANJUNG SELOR Pidana Khusus
Register : 21-06-2021 — Putus : 05-07-2021 — Upload : 10-08-2021
Putusan PN TANJUNG SELOR Nomor 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN Tjs
Tanggal 5 Juli 2021 — Pemohon:
NURDIANA, S.PI
Termohon:
Kepala Kejaksaan RI Cq. Kepala Kejaksaan Tinggi Kaltim Cq. Kepala Kejaksaan Negeri Bulungan
94 — 47
  • Due process of law pada dasarnya bukansematasemata mengenai rule of law, akan tetapi merupakan unsur yangessensial dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan yang intinya adalah bahwa iamerupakan ...a law which hears before it condemns , which procceds uponinguiry, and renders judgement only after trial...;Bahwa pada dasarnya yang menjadi titik sentral adalah perlindungan hakasasi individu terhadap arbitrary action of the goverment.
Pengadilan PN TANJUNG JABUNG TIMUR Pidana Khusus
Register : 13-10-2021 — Putus : 01-11-2021 — Upload : 11-11-2021
Putusan PN TANJUNG JABUNG TIMUR Nomor 1/Pid.Pra/2021/PN Tjt
Tanggal 1 Nopember 2021 — Pemohon:
SUMARDI
Termohon:
Kejaksaan Agung RI, Cq. Kepala Kejaksaan Tinggi Jambi Cq. Kejaksaan Negeri Tanjung Jabung Timur
166 — 110
  • Due process of law padadasarnya bukan sematamata mengenai ruleof law, akan tetapi merupakan unsuryang essensial dalam penyelenggaraanperadilan yang intinya adalah bahwa iamerupakan ...a law which hearsbefore it condemns, which proceeds upon inquiry,and renders judgementonly after trial... Pada dasarnya yang menjadi titik sentraladalahperlindungan hakhak asasi individu. terhadap arbitrary action ofthegoverment.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Putus : 02-10-2013 — Upload : 17-12-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 862 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 2 Oktober 2013 — Ny. SITI HARDIYANTI RUKMANA, Dkk vs PT BERKAH KARYA BERSAMA, Dkk
3449 — 2787 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 862 K/Pdt/2013Investment Agreement tertanggal 23 Agustus 2002 danSupplemental Agreement tertanggal 7 Februari 2003, sebagaimanadikutip sebagai berikut:In the framework of the implementation of the InvestmentAgreement dated 23 August 2002 as further supplemented bythe supplemental agreement dated 7 February 2003 executed bythe parties thereto, including the Principal and the Attorney......t0 call and/or attend any EGM of CTPI which will discuss, interalia, the following matters:5.
    PT TPI (TurutTergugat ) yang membahas masalah/agenda apapun dalam rangkapelaksanaan Investment Agreement tertanggal 23 Agustus 2002dan Supplemental Agreement tertanggal 7 Februari 2003,sebagaimana dikutip sebagai berikut:In the framework of the implementation of the InvestmentAgreement dated 23 August 2002 as further supplemented bythe Supplemental Agreement dated 7 February 2003 executed bythe parties thereto, including the Principal and the Attorney......to call and/or attend any EGM of CTPI which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 19-09-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 812/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 September 2016 — PT. Pertamina (Persero) vs. Direktur Jenderal Pajak
45 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • apon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice has been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures te be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalide to the Laquefaction Company porsit te Beeline 6.1, nedBhol advise (he Trustee of such procedures which
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 17-05-2013 — Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 27-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 312/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Lawan 1. PT. BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2. H. ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA, 3. YUDHA TRISNO, 4. SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA, 5. MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN, 6. PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN, 8. ANKIT PATNI, Penggugat: PT PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Tergugat: 1.PT BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2.H ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA 3.YUDHA TRISNO 4.SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA 5.MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN 6.PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN 7.SUWARNO 8.ANKIT PATNI 9.SKP OVERSEAS PTE,LTD 10.HADI JUANA 11.OLFITRIAN 12.PT CAKRA KARYA BERSAMA 13.PT SOLUSINDO NUSANTARA 14.TRADE CONSORTIUM PTE LTD 15.NOTARIS SITI SAFARIJAH 16.NOTARIS SHELLA FALIANTI,SH 17.KEPALA BADAN KOORDINASI PENANAMAN MODAL REPUBLIK IDONESIA 18.MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAM REPUBLIK INDONESIA
605 — 2666
  • (b)Faith.In the Event that such dispute or a difference cannot be sosettled within 90 (ninety) days from the time such dispute ordifference first arises between the Parties, such disputes ordifference shall be referred to an arbitration held inaccordance with the arbitration rules of SingaporeInternational Arbitration Centre (SIAC) which rules aredeemed to be incorporated by reference into this Clause.Terjemahannya :(a)Setiap perselisinan atau perbedaan yang timbul antara ParaPihak sehubungan dengan
    Putusan No.312/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.difference shall be referred to an arbitration held inaccordance with the arbitration rules of SingaporeInternational Arbitration Centre (SIAC) which rules aredeemed to be incorporated by reference into this Clause.(c) Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, thearbitration tribunal shall consist of a single arbitrator.
    (d) The arbitration shall be conducted by a sole arbitrator tobeappointed by the mutual agreement of the Sellers and thePurchasers and in case of those parties fail to appoint thearbitrator within sixty (60) days then the arbitrator shall beappointed by the Chairmain of SIAC which shall appoint anindependent arbitrator who shall not have any financialinterest in the dispute, controversy or claim.
    The New York Convention on the Recognition ofEnforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards yang telahdiratifikasi berdasarkan Keputusan Presiden No. 34 Tahun1981 (Lembaran Negara No. 40 Tahun 1981)Pasal Il(1) Each Contracting State shall recognize an agreement inwriting under which the parties undertake to submit toarbitration all or any differences which have arisen or whichmay arise between them in respect of a defined legalrelationship, whether contractual or not, concerning asubject matter capable of
Pengadilan PN SEKAYU Pidana Umum Penganiayaan
Register : 18-03-2011 — Putus : 12-04-2012 — Upload : 21-06-2015
Putusan PN SEKAYU Nomor 204/PID.B/2011/PN.SKY
Tanggal 12 April 2012 — MULUD Bin KARSIDI
52 — 17
  • Penalaran hukum (legal reasoning) menurut Neil MacCormic adalahone branch of practical reasoning, which is the application by humans of their reason todeciding how it is right toconduct themselves in situations of choice yang menurutbatasan ini bahwa hukum adalah alat berpikir praktis (untuk mengubah keadaan),bukan sekedar berpikir teoretis (untuk menambah pengetahuan);Menimbang, bahwa Penasihat Hukum terdakwa menyatakan dalam notapembelaannya bahwa terdakwa MULUD Bin KARSIDI tidak mengetahui tujuanmasyarakat
Pengadilan PN TANJUNG KARANG Pidana Khusus
Register : 03-08-2020 — Putus : 19-08-2020 — Upload : 16-09-2020
Putusan PN TANJUNG KARANG Nomor 6/Pid.Pra/2020/PN Tjk
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2020 — Pemohon:
NURHADI
Termohon:
Kepolisian Daerah Propinsi Lampung, Cq. Kapolda Lampung,
138 — 39
  • Adapun tujuan yang ingin dicapai dari pengawasan horizontal dari lembagaPraperadilan tersebut adalah sesuai dengan tujuan umum dibentuknya KUHAP,yaitu untuk menciptakan suatu proses penegakan hukum yang didasarkan padakerangka due proces of law.Due proces of law pada dasarnya bukan sematamata mengenai rule of law, akantetapi merupakan unsur yang essensial dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan yangintinya adalah bahwa ia merupakan ...a law which bears before it condemns, whichproceeds upon inquiry, and
Pengadilan PN PADANG Perdata
Register : 14-02-2019 — Putus : 03-07-2019 — Upload : 17-07-2019
Putusan PN PADANG Nomor 26/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pdg
Tanggal 3 Juli 2019 — Penggugat:
H. SYAHRUDDIN UJANG
Tergugat:
1.Kampus Politeknik Negeri Padang
2.PT.Bank Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat
3.PT. Kawan Lama Cabang Padang, Kota Padang Sumatera Barat
78 — 29
  • S 073131338fH) PNPdo2019 Pid.s... a NPWP : 02.550.026.7201.000Version created last ... qj , ;15156 Tuesday, 9 3... i Harga Penawaran : Rp. 1.015.071.000, (satu milyar limao Terkoreksi belas juta tujuh puluh satu ribu rupiah)Gil PNPdg2019 Pid.5... fVersion created last...15:56 Tuesday, 9 Ju... a Jangka Waktu : 90(sembilanpuluh) hari kalendera Pelaksanaan i 2, PEMENANG CADANGANI@ Which fle do I want to save?
Pengadilan PT PONTIANAK
Putus : 24-10-2018 — Upload : 03-12-2018
Putusan PT PONTIANAK Nomor 58/PDT/2018/PT PTK
Tanggal 24 Oktober 2018 —
146 — 198
  • Hindoli facilities are well managed andmaintained to a good standard.We have requested copies of the Standard Operation Procedure(SOP) for the loading of CPO onto barges together with the pipingdiagram but up to issue of this report, these documents have notbeen provided.As mentioned above, the foreign material found included mineralwater cup 220ml with brand ALPINE which is produced inSurabaya, East Java.
Pengadilan PT PEKANBARU Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 25-01-2017 — Putus : 18-04-2017 — Upload : 12-05-2017
Putusan PT PEKANBARU Nomor 19/PDT/2017/PT.PBR
Tanggal 18 April 2017 — Dasrul Dahlan, Dkk Sebagai PENGGUGAT Lawan PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA, Dkk Sebagai TERGUGAT
143 — 528
  • ChevronPacific Indonesia, yaitu: Our companys foundation is built onour Values, which distinguish us and guide our action. Weconduct our business in socially responsible and ethicalmanner. We respect the law, support universal human rights,protect the environment and benefit the communities where wework.Bahwa sejak tanggal 4 Juni 2010, Serikat Pekerja Nasional Chevron(SPNC) sudah menyampaikan surat kepada bapak Syamsul Bakhri(Manager HRIR PT.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Merek
Putus : 20-06-2017 — Upload : 14-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 58 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017
Tanggal 20 Juni 2017 — SUPER-MAX IPR HOLDINGS AG VS RICHARD LITYO
440 — 232 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • untuk Perlindungan Kekayaan Industri (ParisConvention for The Protection of Industrial Property) dan KonvensiPembentukan Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia (Convention EstablishingThe World Intellectual Property Organization);Pasal 6 bis Konvensi Paris untuk Perlindungan Kekayaan Industrimengatur tentang:The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation sopermits, or at the request of an interested party, to refuse or to cancel theregistration, and to prohibit the use, of a trademark which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 805/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • apon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the DPodok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant te Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds 10poayalice to the Taquefoction Company pours te Aeclinn G1, nodBiol advise the Trustee of such presedures which
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 21-03-2017 — Putus : 25-04-2017 — Upload : 18-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 584 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 25 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SIKA INDONESIA;
57 — 28 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • If the activity isnot one for which the independent enterprise would havebeen willing to pay or perform for itself, the activityordinarily should not be considered as an intragroupservice under the arms length principle.
Pengadilan PN SUNGAI LIAT Pidana Khusus
Register : 10-04-2018 — Putus : 23-04-2018 — Upload : 13-08-2021
Putusan PN SUNGAI LIAT Nomor 1/Pid.Pra/2018/PN Sgl
Tanggal 23 April 2018 — Pemohon:
KASMAN BIN ABAS
Termohon:
Pemerintah Negara RI Cq.Kepolisian Resor Bangka Barat,Cq.Kepolisian sektor Mentok
60 — 7
  • Due process of law pada dasarnya bukan sematamata mengenai ruleof law, akan tetapi merupakan unsur yang esensial penyelenggaraanperadilan yang intinya adalah bahwa ia merupakan ...a law which bearsbefore in condemus, wich process upon inquiry, and renden judgement onlyafter trial... pada dasarnya yang menjadi titik sentaral adalah perlindunganhakhak asasi individu terhadap arbitary action of government.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA UTARA Perdata
Register : 11-02-2021 — Putus : 23-12-2021 — Upload : 03-01-2022
Putusan PN JAKARTA UTARA Nomor 100/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Utr
Tanggal 23 Desember 2021 — Penggugat:
PT Griff Prima Abadi
Tergugat:
1.PT Kartika Eka Yudha Maritim
2.PT Cargoport Indonesia
3.PT ASURANSI DAYIN MITRA, Tbk.
121 — 81
  • In case of a multimodal transport and if the place of damage orloss of the Goods is known, the responsibility of the carrier is determined bythe law which applies to this leg of carriage.Bahwa merujuk dari Bill Of Lading Point 11 angka 1 yang bertanggungjawab atas kerusakan barang dalam waktu pengiriman adalahpengangkut yaitu Pihak Saco Shipping Line LTD Agent dari CargoportIndonesia yang ada di Hamburg;10.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 30-10-2017 — Upload : 13-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1658/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 30 Oktober 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. AMP PLANTATION
34 — 11 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • penerimaan negara agar pembangunan nasional dapatdilaksanakan secara mandir;bahwa dalam teori hukum khususnya terkait dengan pembuatanperaturan perundangundangan dikenal metode "Law andEconomis/Economis Analysis of Law;bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah: "Inbrief, this method applies the tool of economic analysis to law with afocus on the free market's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utilitymaximization (it is being said that the law simply reflects theeconomic system within which