Ditemukan 40 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : nalley nalele nomel name nazely naely namlea namaelo nabela namela nameli namel
Pengadilan PN BALE BANDUNG Pidana Umum
Register : 22-07-2021 — Putus : 22-07-2021 — Upload : 03-08-2021
Putusan PN BALE BANDUNG Nomor 561/Pid.C/2021/PN Blb
Tanggal 22 Juli 2021 — Penyidik Atas Kuasa PU:
AGUS RAHMAT. SH
Terdakwa:
ANDRI DONI
19 — 5
  • Tahun, Tempat DErUpa 2. keep feeteeneseerereeeereeserecssetsernenensenenee ssTed, Learn ncenns pevevavennsssouederss Jenis Kelamin : .WAke my avian asian a'va vviv'bidie We NAMELY UAW EA STNN EDMAN EE LeNaeRenreneasesmenesi ees resSuku : ... BYsASe ......... menerangkan Sbb : .esccccee Lecce etcetera eesme mienncrenneaasetimemmesactte tics en su pacewesansinn PASAL YANG DILANGGAR :SAKSIII Pasal : 24...osfaf..2. Tentang : REAM. LoNama.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 10-03-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1067/C/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 10 Maret 2015 — PT. TRI TUNGGAL PRATYAKSA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
28 — 3 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Project);Dalam kontrak disebutkan halhal sebagai berikut:This Contract (hereinafter called the "Contract") is made on the 6th day of themonth of December, 2006 between, on the hand, Directorate General ofWater Resources (DGWR), Ministry of Public Works, Republic ofIndonesia (hereinafter called the "Client") and, on the other hand a JointVenture consisting of the following entities, each of which will be jointly andseverally liable to the Client for all the Consultant's obligation under theContract namely
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 10-03-2015 — Upload : 01-12-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1072/C/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 10 Maret 2015 — PT. TRI TUNGGAL PRATYAKSA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
36 — 20 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Project);Dalam kontrak disebutkan halhal sebagai berikut:This Contract (hereinafter called the "Contract") is made on the 6th day of themonth of December, 2006 between, on the hand, Directorate General ofWater Resources (DGWR), Ministry of Public Works, Republic ofIndonesia (hereinafter called the "Client") and, on the other hand a JointVenture consisting of the following entities, each of which will be jointly andseverally liable to the Client for all the Consultant's obligation under theContract namely
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 10-11-2014 — Putus : 10-03-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1069 C/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 10 Maret 2015 — PT. TRI TUNGGAL PRATYAKSA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
31 — 16 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Sector Project)Dalam kontrak disebutkan halhal sebagai berikut :This Contract (hereinafter called the Contract) is made on the 6th dayof the month of December, 2006 between, on the hand, DirectorateGeneral of Water Resources (DGWR), Ministry of Public Works, Republicof Indonesia (hereinafter called the Client) and, on the other hand aJoint Venture consisting of the following entities, each of which will bejointly and severally liable to the Client for all the Consultants obligationunder the Contract namely
    :This Contract (hereinafter called the Contract) is made on the 6th dayof the month of December, 2006 between, on the hand, DirectorateGeneral of Water Resources (DGWR), Ministry of Public Works, Republicof Indonesia (hereinafter called the Client) and, on the other hand aHalaman 9 dari 15 halaman Putusan Nomor 1069/C/PK/PJK/2014Joint Venture consisting of the following entities, each of which will bejointly and severally liable to the Client for all the Consultants obligationunder the Contract namely
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 10-03-2015 — Upload : 30-11-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1070/C/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 10 Maret 2015 — PT. TRI TUNGGAL PRATYAKSA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
27 — 11 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Project);Dalam kontrak disebutkan halhal sebagai berikut:This Contract (hereinafter called the "Contract") is made on the 6thday of the month of December, 2006 between, on the hand,Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR), Ministry of PublicWorks, Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter called the "Client") and,on the other hand a Joint Venture consisting of the following entities,each of which will be jointly and severally liable to the Client for allthe Consultant's obligation under the Contract namely
    Sector Project);Dalam kontrak disebutkan halhal sebagai berikut:This Contract (hereinafter called the Contract) is made on the 6thday of the month of December, 2006 between, on the hand,Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR), Ministry of PublicWorks, Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter called the Client) and,on the other hand a Joint Venture consisting of the following entities,each of which will be jointly and severally liable to the Client for allthe Consultants obligation under the Contract namely
Pengadilan PA TEMBILAHAN Perdata Agama
Register : 12-10-2017 — Putus : 12-12-2017 — Upload : 20-07-2019
Putusan PA TEMBILAHAN Nomor 0722/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Tbh
Tanggal 12 Desember 2017 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
32 — 11
  • ebay Teqece inengitaban sepa Penanuyat "kalau rasaber suja dan ievkadang joga dating ke russ maksi, celwlal) fiidni 2017 Pengqugal muish tak perah pulang ke namely) sins vidas es cmaticied en Sith tb lime Wailenkenurs! minuman borwkchsl atau mebuemabulan monnNiatuh yiarah Kinga Mengancim can marmite! Paigguqat:Bahwu waks! idok cengetabul apakah anion Pergqugal danganTergqugal wash ace asiing berarminaas!
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Putus : 10-03-2015 — Upload : 30-11-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1068/C/PK/PJK/2014
Tanggal 10 Maret 2015 — PT TRI TUNGGAL PRATYAKSA vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
33 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Project)Dalam kontrak disebutkan halhal sebagai berikut :This Contract (hereinafter called the "Contract") is made on the 6thday of the month of December, 2006 between, on the hand,Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWAR), Ministry of PublicWorks, Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter called the "Client") and, onthe other hand a Joint Venture consisting of the following entities,each of which will be jointly and severally liable to the Client for all theConsultant's obligation under the Contract namely
    Sector Project)Dalam kontrak disebutkan halhal sebagai berikut :This Contract (hereinafter called the Contract) is made on the 6thday of the month of December, 2006 between, on the hand,Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR), Ministry of PublicWorks, Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter called the Client) and, onthe other hand a Joint Venture consisting of the following entities, eachof which will be jointly and severally liable to the Client for all theConsultants obligation under the Contract namely
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Arbitrase
Putus : 27-12-2012 — Upload : 18-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 631 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 27 Desember 2012 — HARVEY NICHOLS AND COMPANY LIMITED, suatu perseroan terbatas yang didirikan berdasarkan hukum Inggris (registrasi No. 1774537) vs 1. PT. HAMPARAN NUSANTARA; 2. PT. MITRA ADIPERKASA, Tbk;
681 — 631 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For the reasons set out above I award as follows:a.I declare that the Exclusive licence agreement between the parties dated23 January 2007 ("the Agreement") is a valid agreement which isbinding on the parties;I confirm the declarations made in my award on Jurisdiction dated 14June 2010, namely that:1.il.iii.Clause 15 of the Exclusive Licence Agreement dated 23 January2007 between the Claimants and the Respondents constitutes a validand binding arbitration agreement between the parties;My appointment
    failing to renew the second letter of guarantee after the claimant'sdrawdown in accordance with clause 7.4 of the Agreement; andiv. issuing the proceedings dated 26 May 2010 against the claimant inthe South Jakarta District Court ("the Jakarta proceedings");I declare that the second respondent is in breach of the Agreement in thefollowing respects:ifailing to perform its obligation to ensure the performance by thefirst respondent of all monetary obligation of the first respondentunder the Agreement, namely
    For the reasons set out above paragraph 71 of my award is amended to readas follows (the only changes being to subparagraphs (f) and (g):a I declare that the Exclusive licence agreement between the parties dated 23January 2007 ("the Agreement") is a valid agreement which is binding on the parties;b I confirm the declarations made in my award on Jurisdiction dated 14 June2010, namely that:i.
    I declare that the second respondent is in breach of the Agreement in thefollowing respects:i. failing to perform its obligation to ensure the performance by the firstrespondent of all monetary obligation of the first respondent under theAgreement, namely the timely payment of minimum royalties and therenewal or reissue of the second letter of guarantee by the firstrespondent; andii. issuing the Jakarta proceedings;I declare that the conduct of both respondents described in (c) and (d)above amounts
Pengadilan PA RANTAU PRAPAT Perdata Agama
Register : 25-06-2024 — Putus : 23-07-2024 — Upload : 23-07-2024
Putusan PA RANTAU PRAPAT Nomor 943/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Rap
Tanggal 23 Juli 2024 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
2 — 1
    1. Declaring that the Defendant, who has been officially summoned and is fit to appear at court, is not present;
    2. Granting the Plaintiff's claim by default;
    3. Imposing a divorce of one ba'in sughra on the Defendant (Bagus Budiono bin Ali Mukti) against the Plaintiff (Tia Andriani binti Suyono);
    4. Determine that the two children of the Plaintiff and Defendant, namely
Pengadilan PN DENPASAR Perdata
Register : 29-01-2021 — Putus : 18-08-2021 — Upload : 19-08-2021
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 124/Pdt.G/2021/PN Dps
Tanggal 18 Agustus 2021 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
130 — 75
  • Whereas based on the Lease Deed Number: 15, dated April 23, 2019, thePlaintiff intends / intends to lease a portion of the land, namely an area of900 M2 (nine hundred square meters) to the Defendant;. Bahwa Penggugat dengan Tergugat membuat dan mengikatkan diri dalamPerjanjian Sewa Menyewa Tanah Nomor: LEG 709/VIII/2019, tertanggal 15Agustus 2019, dimana terhadap Perjanjian tersebut telah disahkan dan/ataudi legalisasi oleh Putu Ngurah Aryana, SH, Notaris di Kuta, pada tanggal 15Agustus 2019 ;.
    tergugatselama 9 tahun 7 bulan, dimulai sejak 15 Agustus 2019 sampai dengan 21Maret 2028 ;Whereas against the actions of the DEFENDANT has committed the act ofWANPRESTASI BREACH OF PLEDGE and in order to avoid widerlosses and legal certainty, the PLAINTIFF intends to carry out theimplementation of the lease agreement as mentioned above and further tothe Land Lease Agreement Number: LEG 709 / VIII / 2019, dated August15, 2019, to be implemented in accordance with the achievements madeby the Defendant, namely
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata
Register : 21-10-2016 — Putus : 23-11-2017 — Upload : 28-11-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 746/Pdt.G.Plw/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 23 Nopember 2017 — Arfan Syafril, Lawan NSB Niderelbe Schiffahrtsgesselschaft MbH & Co.KG,
475 — 506
  • inimenyatakan dan menjamin bahwaPerjanjian ini dibuat danditandatangani oleh masingmasingPihak dengan kesadaran penuh dantanpa ada paksaan dari pihakmanapun.Demikian Perjanjian ini dibuat danditandatangani pada hari dan tanggalsebagaimana tersebut di atas, dibuatdalam 5 (lima) rangkap, yang masingmasing rangkapnya dibubuhi meteraiyang cukup dan kemudian masing(4) This Agreement is set forth andinterpreted by virtue of the laws ofthe Republic of Indonesia.(5) This Agreement is executed in abilingual format, namely
Pengadilan PN CILACAP
Register : 12-06-2012 — Putus : 03-04-2013 — Upload : 27-04-2014
Putusan PN CILACAP Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2012/PN Clp
Tanggal 3 April 2013 —
277 — 171
  • (forty two million United States Dollar);Whereas in fact the development of the Cilacap flour mill project has notbeen completed as per agreed schedule, 31s* December 1996; rather, itdelayed for 4 (four) months later, namely on 30th April 1997 as defined inthe Certificate of Completion dated 30% April 1997 (Exhibit P12) issued byBuhler Ltd., Uzwil/Switzerland as the main supplier of the flour mill plantand machinery.Whereas the 4 (four) months of delay resulted in cost overrun of total cost ofthe
    Point 2, Guarantee for Cost Overrun, last paragraph of the4444Deed of Payment and Completion Guarantee No. 60 (see Exhibit P11)stating as follows:.. then the Guarantors will, at the direction of the Facility Agent, pay ... anysuch excess amount by way of one lump sum cash payment upon first writtendeman by the Facility Agent. 27 Whereas as such, Plaintiff as the Facility Agent shall be entitled to thefulfillment by Defendants of the Deed of Payment and Completion GuaranteeNo. 60 (see Exhibit P11) , namely
    (fourmillion four hundred thirty thousand two hundred fifty three United StatesDollar) in cash and lumpsum not later than 7 (seven) calendar days from thepronouncing of court decision;28 Whereas furthermore, Plaintiff shall be entitled to claim for indemnity fordefault by Defendants of the guarantee for cost overrun, namely loss ofpotential profit due to failure by Defendants of obligations to guarantee thecost overrun the amount of which, according to the law and justice, is 10%45(ten percent) per
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Merek
Putus : 17-10-2011 — Upload : 06-03-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 595 K/PDT.SUS/2011
Tanggal 17 Oktober 2011 — WEN KEN DRUG, CO. PTE. LTD.; TJIOE BUDI YUWONO / BUDI YUWONO
296 — 191 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 595 K/Pdt.Sus/201 1medicinal drinks to cure ulcers or stomach aches, medicinal drinks to curethroat, medicinal drinks to cure digestic disorders; dietetic substances adaptedfor medical use; food for babies; royal jelly beverages for medical purposes;Class 32:Fruit drinks and fruit juices; energy drinks (nonmedicated);preparations for making beverages, namely; pastilles for effervescingbeverages, powders for effervescing beverages; nonalcoholic beverages,namely; syrups for beverages use, mineral
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG TUN Pajak
Register : 08-01-2015 — Putus : 31-03-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 50 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 31 Maret 2015 — PT. SENTOSA BIRUNUSA VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK;
102 — 94 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • a source of substantive as well as procedural rights (wadeand forsyth 1994, p. 419);Thus if a public body resiles from clear and unambiguous representation orundertaking giving rise to a legitimate expectation, an applicant may havegrounds for expecting a particular substantive course of action to befollowed by the decision maker. it is important to note that a doctrine oflegal certainty exists as part of the jurisprudence of all the member statesof the EU and is founded on the same assumption, namely
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata
Register : 27-09-2018 — Putus : 21-11-2019 — Upload : 09-12-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 536/Pdt.G/2018/PN Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 21 Nopember 2019 — Penggugat:
RR. FRANSISKA KUMALAWATI SUSILO
Tergugat:
1.EDWARD SEKY SOERYADJAYA
2.EDWIN SOERYADJAYA
3.JOYCE SOERYADJAYA
4.JUDITH SOERYADJAYA
Turut Tergugat:
1.BR. A. ATILAH RAPATRIATI
2.ADIMAS SEKY SOERYADJAYA
3.ADITYA W SEKY SOERYADJAYA
4.KRISTIN LEO SOERYADJAYA
5.BUDI SETIADHARMA
6.HUSNIHERON
7.HANDIANTO GANIS
8.SANDI RAHAJU
9.NY. RUKMASANTI HARDJASATYA, SH.
10.Dr. Ir. SIE TWAN LOK
11.TOSSIN HIMAWAN
12.LILY SOERYADJAYA
13.DARMAWAN TJOA, SH.,SE
396 — 105
  • Foto copy Terjemahan Deed of Separation Tertanggal 18 Juni 1999,diberi tanda P9 ;10.Foto copy Complaint Against Solicitors Namely Ng Soon Kai and AbdurRaheem Dated 27 December 2007, diberi tanda P10 ;11.Foto copy Terjemahan Complaint Against Solicitors Namely Ng Soon Kaiand Abdur Raheem Dated 27 December 2007, diberi tanda, P11;12.Foto copy Licence and Certificate of Confidential Marriage dated 3Agustus1994, diberi tanda P12;13.Foto copy Laporan Perkawinan Nomor: 103/Perkawinan LN/06/2009Tanggal
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Merek
Putus : 25-02-2013 — Upload : 19-05-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 172 PK/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 25 Februari 2013 — WEN KEN DRUG CO, (Pte) Ltd, vs TJIOE BUDI YUWONO/BUDI YUWONO, dk
176 — 129 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • , vitamins, herbs(medicinal); tea (medicated); ointments and balms; health supplements beingbeverages for medical purposes; medicinal drinks to cure inner body heat,medicinal drinks to cure ulcers or stomach aches, medicinal drinks to curethroat, medicinal drinks to cure digestic disorders; dietetic substances adaptedfor medical use; food for babies; royal jelly beverages for medical purposes;Class 32:Fruit drinks and fruit juices; energy drinks (nonmedicated);preparations for making beverages, namely
    ; pastilles for effervescingbeverages, powders for effervescing beverages; nonalcoholic beverages,namely; syrups for beverages use, mineral and aerated waters;e Di Republic of ChinaSertifikat Merek di keluarkan dengan Nomor 1395384 dengan Nama PendaftarPT.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Pidana Umum Kejahatan terhadap keamanan negara
Putus : 06-10-2010 — Upload : 15-11-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 29 PK/PID/2009
Tanggal 6 Oktober 2010 — RONALD SAGALA, DK
60 — 31 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For, if the state were to resotto killing in order to enforce its will, it wouldlegitimize the very behaviour which the law sought torepress, namely the use of deadly force to settledisputes;Hal. 27 dari 31 hal. Put. No. 29 PK/Pid/2009Bahwa argumen Beccaria sangat menarik dan ada benarnya.Pembunuhan masih banyak terjadi.
Pengadilan PN MAKASSAR Pidana Umum
Register : 01-03-2023 — Putus : 12-06-2023 — Upload : 20-06-2023
Putusan PN MAKASSAR Nomor 205/Pid.B/2023/PN Mks
Tanggal 12 Juni 2023 — Penuntut Umum:
1.IBRAHIM KHALIL, S.H.,M.H.
2.FEDRIKA YAKOMINA URIWAY, S.H.
3.BINANG MARITSAL CLARALINARD YOMAKI, S.H.
4.MUHAMMAD IHSAN HUSNI, S.H.
Terdakwa:
KOSTAN KARLOS BONAY
67 — 19
  • Republik Federal Papua Barat Jayapura Ibu Kota Negara Papua Barat tanggal 31 Juli 2018 (Asli);
  • 1 Lembar Spanduk/Baliho Berwarna Biru Muda yang bertuliskan Peta Negara Papua Barat Map Of West Papua Estate ;
  • 1 (satu) lembar Spanduk/Baliho berwarna biru muda yang bertuliskan Negara Republik Papua Barat memiliki dua Partai Politik yaitu Partai Persatuan papua (P3) dan Partai Demokrat Papua (PDP) / The Federal Republic Of Has Two Political Parties Namely
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata
Putus : 15-11-2010 — Upload : 19-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 337 PK/Pdt/2010
Tanggal 15 Nopember 2010 — PT. Asuransi Hanjin Korindo ; PT. LG Insurance Indonesia
137 — 98 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Maret 2001, #4dapatdikutip sebagai berikut"Details of Fees :1) Legal Fee : Rp.25,000,000 (Not Returnable)2) Operating Cost : Rp.50,000,000 (Not Returnable)3) Success Fee : US$.750,000 only subject to the claimbeing not valid as a result of theinvestigation of the accident namely, noclaim.Terjemahan tersumpahnya sebagai berikut"Rincian Ongkos :1) Ongkos Hukum : Rp.25,000,000 (Tidak Kembali)2) Biaya Operasi : Rp.50,000,000 (Tidak Kembali)3) Success Fee : US$750,000 (hanya berlaku jika klaimterbukti
Pengadilan PT MAKASSAR Pidana Umum
Register : 03-07-2023 — Putus : 03-08-2023 — Upload : 04-08-2023
Putusan PT MAKASSAR Nomor 512/PID/2023/PT MKS
Tanggal 3 Agustus 2023 — Pembanding/Penuntut Umum I : IBRAHIM KHALIL, S.H.,M.H.
Pembanding/Penuntut Umum II : FEDRIKA YAKOMINA URIWAY, S.H.
Pembanding/Penuntut Umum III : BINANG MARITSAL CLARALINARD YOMAKI, S.H.
Pembanding/Penuntut Umum IV : MUHAMMAD IHSAN HUSNI, S.H.
Terbanding/Terdakwa : HELLESVRED BEZALIEL SOLEMAN WAROPEN ALIAS SOLEMAN
59 — 25
  • Republik Federal Papua Barat Jayapura Ibu Kota Negara Papua Barat tanggal 31 Juli 2018 (Asli);
  • 1 Lembar Spanduk/Baliho Berwarna Biru Muda yang bertuliskan Peta Negara Papua Barat Map Of West Papua Estate ;
  • 1 (satu) lembar Spanduk/Baliho berwarna biru muda yang bertuliskan Negara Republik Papua Barat memiliki dua Partai Politik yaitu Partai Persatuan papua (P3) dan Partai Demokrat Papua (PDP) / The Federal Republic Of Has Two Political Parties Namely