Ditemukan 88 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Author : Rahmad Setiawan; J. Satrio;
Cessie
716413660
  • Beberapa segi lembaga hukum cessie perlu mendapat perhatian, yaitu1. pengertian tentang cessie perlu diseragamkan agar dalam pelaksanaannya bisa  menghasilkan keputusan yang baik;2. bahwa penyerahan benda-benda tak bertubuh yang bukan berupa ... [Selengkapnya]
  • contain the proprietary agreement of transfer(under Netherlands law the requirement of delivery is divided into the requirementof a so called proprietary agreement (zakelijke overeenkomst) and a delivery act;a proprietary agreement, in contrast to the agreement that can constitute the titleof a transfer, is understood to mean the multilateral juridical act whereby the partiesintend to transfer a certain property to each other, so that the other party can beregarded thereafter as the titleholder).The signing
    by both parties is not a constitutive requirement: the signing by thealienator, followed by the acceptance by the acquirer requiring no prescribed form,Penjelasan Hukum tentang Cessie 29 isi2ok.indd 29 42/12/2010 2:46:43 Pis sufficient.* The signing by both parties is obvious, of course, and can be practicalfor evidentiary reasons.The instrument of assignment can be a simple private instrument (art. 3:94 par.1 BW).
Putus : 22-06-2016 — Upload : 14-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 453/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Juni 2016 — PT. CHAROEN POKPHAND INDONESIA, Tbk VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
15698 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Dibawah inidikutip ketentuan Pasal 2 Perjanjian Pengalihan Hak KekayaanIntelektual antara CPG dan CPIG:Pasal 2 Perjanjian Pengalihnan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (VideBukti PK5):Article 2Assigment2.1 In consideration of CPIG agreeing to license the CPIntellectual Proprietary Rights to CPI under theNovation Agreement and such other relatedagreements and documents to be executed by andbetween CPIG and CPI, CPG does hereby acceptthe assignment of the CP Intellectual Proprietaryrights from CPG.2.2 With the signing
Register : 11-12-2018 — Putus : 12-02-2019 — Upload : 20-05-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 968/Pdt.G.Arb/2018/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 12 Februari 2019 — PT. SAKTI MAS MULIA, lawan 1.PT.PLN (PERSERO), 2.ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA BANI
6951804
  • TERMOHON mendalilkan bahwa PEMOHON telah melakukanperbuatan cidera janji (wanprestasi) karena tidak melaksanakan progresspekerjaan sementara TERMOHON telah melaksanakan kewajibannyakepada PEMOHON berdasarkan perjanjian.5.1.52.5.3.Bahwa pada halaman 7 poin 6 permohonan arbitrasenya,TERMOHONI mengakui memiliki kewajiban untuk menyerahkanlahan lokasi pembangunan PLTU Baubau kepada PEMOHON.Poin 6 Permohonan Arbitrase TERMOHON berbunyi :Bahwa berdasarkan klausula 1.29 buku Perjanjian dan CDANo.G004 Signing
    G004 : Signing of Contract Perjanjian Pemborongan yaitumenyerahkan lahan lokasi pembangunan PLTU Bau Bau kepadaKonsorsium Para Termohon.
Putus : 07-05-2014 — Upload : 14-06-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 417 K/PID.SUS/2014
Tanggal 7 Mei 2014 — HOTASI D.P. NABABAN
23333819 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • MESNER tanggal 15Desember 2006, namun Terdakwa HOTASI D.P NABABAN pada tanggal 21Desember 2006 justru menandatangani Surat Nomor : MNA/DZ/2006/1/3/KU531 yang ditujukan kepada Bank Mandiri perihal Transfer ke Rekening Hume& Associaties PC senilai US$.1.000.000 (satu juta dollar Amerika Serikat),padahal seharusnya sesuai dengan Lease Agreement pada point SecurityDeposit disebutkan : lessee shall pay to lessor a Security Deposit in cash inamount of US $.500.000 will be paid within one day after lessor signing
    namun pada tanggal 21 Desember 2006, TerdakwaHOTASI D.P NABABAN selaku Direktur Utama PT.MNA justru menandatangani Surat Nomor : MNA/DZ/2006/I/3/KU531 yang ditujukan kepada BankMandiri perihal Transfer ke Rekening Hume & Associaties PC senilaiUS$.1.000.000 (satu juta dollar Amerika Serikat), padahal seharusnya sesuaidengan Lease Agreement pada point Security Deposit disebutkan : Lesseeshall pay to lessor a Security Deposit in cash in amount of US $.500.000 willbe paid within one day after lessor signing
Register : 23-12-2014 — Putus : 09-02-2015 — Upload : 26-05-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 791/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 9 Februari 2015 — PT. TRUBA JAYA ENGINEERING Lawan 1. BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI). 2. PT. ADHI KARYA ( Persero) Tbk.
403254
  • The Sub Contractor shallsubmit detail schedule to Contractor for approval after signing of theContract Agreement).Bagian 2 Pasal 2.41:The time for completion shall be in accordance with the Contractschedule between Contractor and Owner.
    The Sub Contractor shallsubmit detail schedule to Contractor for approval after signing of theContractor Agreement.Bagian 2 Pasal 2.42:Should the Sub Contractor be delayed in the final completion of theWorks due to causes as listed in Part 2, Clause 2.19 ForceMajeure, then an extension of time as determined by the Contractor,will be granted by the Owner and Contractor, provided, however,that the Sub Contractor has within fourteen (14) days after theoccurrence of such event given to the Contractor
Putus : 04-09-2015 — Upload : 24-08-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 41 PK/Pid.Sus/2015
Tanggal 4 September 2015 — HOTASI D.P. NABABAN
12781643 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • MESNER tanggal 15 Desember 2006, namun Terdakwa HOTASI D.PNABABAN pada tanggal 21 Desember 2006 justru menandatangani Surat Nomor :MNA/DZ/2006/I/3/KU531 yang ditujukan kepada Bank Mandiri perihal Transfer keRekening Hume & Associaties PC senilai US$.1.000.000 (satu juta dollar AmerikaSerikat), padahal seharusnya sesuai dengan Lease Agreement pada point SecurityDeposit disebutkan : lessee shall pay to lessor a Security Deposit in cash in amountof US $.500.000 will be paid within one day after lessor signing
    namun pada tanggal 21 Desember2006, Terdakwa HOTASI D.P NABABAN selaku Direktur Utama PT.MNA justrumenandata ngani Surat Nomor : MNA/DZ/2006/I/3/KU531 yang ditujukan kepadaBank Mandiri perihal Transfer ke Rekening Hume & Associaties PC senilai US$.1.000.000 (satu juta dollar Amerika Serikat), padahal seharusnya sesuai denganLease Agreement pada point Security Deposit disebutkan : Lessee shall pay to lessora Security Deposit in cash in amount of US $.500.000 will be paid within one dayafter lessor signing
Register : 29-01-2020 — Putus : 31-03-2020 — Upload : 31-03-2020
Putusan PT MEDAN Nomor 63/Pdt/2020/PT MDN
Tanggal 31 Maret 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : Chin Tee Kheng Diwakili Oleh : ROOS NELLY SH MH
Terbanding/Tergugat III : Gopal Naraindas Daryani/Pemilik 18 lembar saham dan Direktur Utama PT. Dharma Perisai Abadi dan juga Pemilik 256 Lembar Saham dan Direktur PT. Golden Paninda Group
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Budiayansyah/Pemilik 18 lembar saham dan Direktur PT. Dharma Perisai Abadi dan juga Pemilik 256 Lembar Saham PT. Golden Paninda Group
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Zul Fahrida Hanim/Pemilik 14 lembar saham dan Komisaris PT. Dharma Perisai Abadi dan juga Pemilik 288 Lembar Saham dan Komisaris PT. Golden Paninda Group
11471
  • Dharma Perisai Abadi dstBahwa secara nyata dan jelas didalam isi Memorandum Of Understanding(terlampir) tertanggal 21 Januari 2014 tentang pengakhiran perjanjianHalaman 12 dari 34 halaman Putusan Nomor 63/Pdt/2020/PT MDN(TERMINATION) pada poin a. dikatakan : "Upon signing of the officialcontract between aforesaid parties yang artinya kurang lebih adalahsetelah penandatanganan kontrak resmi antara para pihak yang sehinggadalam hal ini MOU tanggal 21 Januari 2014 antara Chin Tee Keng (ic.Penggugat)
Register : 28-01-2020 — Putus : 16-03-2020 — Upload : 16-03-2020
Putusan PT MEDAN Nomor 57/Pdt/2020/PT MDN
Tanggal 16 Maret 2020 — Pembanding/Penggugat : Tan Cheow Boon
Terbanding/Tergugat III : Gopal Naraindas Daryani/Pemilik 18 lembar saham dan Direktur Utama PT. Dharma Perisai Abadi dan juga Pemilik 256 Lembar Saham dan Direktur PT. Golden Paninda Group
Terbanding/Tergugat I : Budiayansyah/Pemilik 18 lembar saham dan Direktur PT. Dharma Perisai Abadi dan juga Pemilik 256 Lembar Saham PT. Golden Paninda Group
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Zul Fahrida Hanim/Pemilik 14 lembar saham dan Komisaris PT. Dharma Perisai Abadi dan juga Pemilik 288 Lembar Saham dan Komisaris PT. Golden Paninda Group
13488
  • Dharma Perisai Abadi.dst" Bahwa secara nyata dan jelas didalam isi Memorandum OfUnderstanding (terlampir) tertanggal 21 Januari 2014 tentangpengakhiran perjanjian (TERMINATION) pada poin a. dikatakan :"Upon signing of the official contract between aforesaid parties" yangartinya kurang lebih adalah "setelah penandatanganan kontrak resmiantara para pihak" yang sehingga dalam hal ini MOU tanggal 21Januari 2014 antara Tan Cheow Boon (ic.
Register : 09-10-2017 — Putus : 29-11-2017 — Upload : 20-04-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 612/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 29 Nopember 2017 — PT.VERSACON MEDICAL >< CARL ZEISS PTE Ltd CS
19096
  • Dear Sujay, appreciate your mail and your concern in delay in signing theagreement. Anyway, had signed the agreement in Jakarta lastweek and it will be couriered to y ou today."Terjemahannya :"Yang terhormat Sujay,Saya menghargai surat anda dan kekhawatiran anda mengenaitertundanya penandatanganan perjanjian. Bagaimanapun juga, sayatelah menandatangani perjanjian tersebut di Jakarta minggu laludan itu akan dikirimkan kepada anda melalui kurir hari ini."
    No.612/ Pdt/2017/PT.DKI4.1.1 In this regard and to facilitate paragraph 4.1 above,Carl Zeiss will arrange for the signing of a separateagreement between Carl Zeiss' logistic/distributionnetwork partner PT Elo Karsa (EKUC) and PTVMfor purposes of allowing PTVM, from 1 July 2013 until30 June 2014, to sell Carl Zeissneurosurgical/ENT/spine products in Indonesia as perthe 2011 Agreement (as a subdistributor of CarlZeiss' said logistic/distribution network partner);4.1.2 From 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014
    In this regard and to facilitate paragraph 4.1 above, CarlZeiss will arrange for the signing of a separate agreementbetween Carl Zeiss logistic/distribution network partnerPT Elo Karsa (EKUC) and PTVM for purposes ofallowing PTVM, from 1 July 2013 until 30 June 2014,to sell Carl Zeiss neurosurgical/ENT/spine productsin Indonesia as per the 2011 Agreement (as a subdistributor of Carl Zeiss said logistic/distribution networkpartner);4.1.2 From 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 (both datesinclusive), PTVM
Register : 08-07-2014 — Putus : 14-04-2014 — Upload : 27-10-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 342/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst.
Tanggal 14 April 2014 — PT TARUNA CIPTA KENCANA >< PT GALANGAN MERCUSUAR
282131
  • Third) Payment: 80% (eighty percent) of the contract priceamounting to SGD. 880,000 (Singapore Dollars eight hundred eightythousand only), shall be paid upon delivery of the vessel and beforedeparture of the Vessel from Builder's yard";Pasal 2.3 Perjanjian No. 008"a) Ist (First) Payment: 10% (percent) of the contract priceamounting to SGD. 195,000 (Singapore Dollars one hundred ninetyPutusan No.342/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst.five thousand only), shall be paid within seven (7) working daysafter contract signing
Register : 27-01-2016 — Putus : 13-12-2016 — Upload : 02-05-2018
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 42/PDT.G/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 13 Desember 2016 — PT. VERSACON MEDICAL Lawan 1.CARL ZEISS Pte Ltd 2.KEPALA PERWAKILAN dari KANTOR PERWAKILAN CARL ZEISS Pte Ltd 3.PT. ELO KARSA UTAMA
321200
  • Dear Sujay, appreciate your mail and your concern in delay in signing the agreement.Anyway, had signed the agreement in Jakarta last week and it will becouriered to y ou today."Terjemahannya :"Yang terhormat Sujay,Saya menghargai surat anda dan kekhawatiran anda mengenaitertundanya penandatanganan perjanjian. Bagaimanapun juga, saya telahmenandatangani perjanjian tersebut di Jakarta minggu lalu dan itu akandikirimkan kepada anda melalui kurir hari ini."
    thedistributorship activities in respect of the Carl Zeissneurosurgical/ENT/spine products after an agreed stipulated timeperiod.We are pleased to note, following our meeting on 22 May 2013, thatCarl Zeiss and PTVM have reached an amicable understanding and mutuallysatisfactory arrangement to effectand implement transition plans relating to thechange in the Carl Zeiss' distribution network structure in Indonesia."4.1.1 In this regard and to facilitate paragraph 4.1 above, CarlZeiss will arrange for the signing
    In this regard and to facilitate paragraph 4.1 above, Carl Zeisswill arrange for the signing of a separate agreement betweenCarl Zeiss logistic/distribution network partner PT Elo Karsa(EKUC) and PTVM for purposes of allowing PTVM, from 1 July2013 until 30 June 2014, to. sell Carl Zeissneurosurgical/ENT/spine products in Indonesia as per the 2011Agreement (as a subdistributor of Carl Zeiss saidlogistic/distribution network partner);4.1.2 From 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 (both dates inclusive), PTVMwill
Register : 14-03-2018 — Putus : 28-05-2018 — Upload : 07-06-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 175/PDT/2018/PT.DKI
Tanggal 28 Mei 2018 — FICO CORPORATION CO.Ltd >< BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI) CS
172127
  • Dalam Pasal 1.3 dan Pasal 3 Konvensi New York 1958dinyatakan sebagai berikut:Pasal 1.3 Konvensi New York 1958 :When signing, ratifying or acceding to this Convention, or notifyingextension under article X hereof, any State may on the basis ofHal 34 Putusan No. 175/PDT/2018/PT.DKI.reciprocity declare that it wll apply the Convention to the recognition andenforcement of awards made only in the territory of another ContractingState.
Putus : 03-08-2016 — Upload : 11-11-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 328 PK/Pdt/2016
Tanggal 3 Agustus 2016 — BRIAN LEE SKINNER, dkk vs AGUS ERMAWAN
7031 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 328 PK/Pdt/2016* Paving salaries,expenses and other costs associated with therunning of the business,office administration, office management,personnel affairs,employee recruitment, employee remunerelatio andevalution; Signing letters (correspondence) and agreements; Providing sugestion and opinion for cooperation advancement,etcTerjemahan resminya:Pasal 3 ayat (2) Agreement;Didalam divisi pelatinan, pihak kedua memiliki tugas dan kewenanganakhir sebagi berikut: Perekrutan dan pemberhentian
Putus : 26-03-2014 — Upload : 24-03-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3277 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 26 Maret 2014 — BRlAN LEE SKINNER, DK. VS. AGUS ERMAWAN
7242 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 3277 K/Pdt/2013e Signing letters (correspondence) and agreements;e Providing sugestion and opinion for cooperation advancement,etcTerjemahan resminya :Pasal 3 ayat 2 Agreement. Didalam divisi pelatinan, Pihak Kedua memiliki tugas dan kewenanganakhir sebagi berikut : Perekrutan dan pemberhentian tenaga kerja.
Register : 06-06-2018 — Putus : 17-07-2018 — Upload : 15-07-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 16/PID.TPK/2018/PT DKI
Tanggal 17 Juli 2018 — Pembanding/Penuntut Umum : Afni Carolina
Terbanding/Terdakwa : NUR ALAM
2155964
  • Billy Indonesia kepada Richcorp International tahun 2013 besertalampirannya;Dikembalikan kepada DISTOMY LASIMONBB No.308: 5 (lima) lembar fotokopi Contract For Purchase & Sale Of NickelOre Contract No: 054/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date: Dec 9,2013 Seller: PT BillyIndonesia Buyer: Well Victory International Limited;BB No.309: 5 (lima) lembar fotokopi Contract For Purchase & Sale Of NickelOre Contract No: 056/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date: Dec 16,2013 Seller: PTBilly Indonesia Buyer: Well Victory International
    Putusan No.16/Pid.SusTPK/2018/PT.DKIBB No.308: 5 (lima) lembar fotokopi Contract For Purchase & Sale Of NickelOre Contract No: 054/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date: Dec 9,2013 Seller: PT BillyIndonesia Buyer: Well Victory International Limited;BB No.309: 5 (lima) lembar fotokopi Contract For Purchase & Sale Of NickelOre Contract No: 056/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date: Dec 16,2013 Seller: PTBilly Indonesia Buyer: Well Victory International Limited;Dikembalikan kepada KAMRULLAHBB No.310: 1 (satu) bundel
    Putusan No.16/Pid.SusTPK/2018/PT.DKIBB No.308: 5 (lima) lembar fotokopi Contract For Purchase & Sale OfNickel Ore Contract No: 054/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date: Dec 9,2013Seller: PT Billy Indonesia Buyer: Well Victory International Limited;BB No.309: 5 (lima) lembar fotokopi Contract For Purchase & Sale OfNickel Ore Contract No: 056/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date: Dec 16,2013Seller: PT Billy Indonesia Buyer: Well Victory International Limited;Dikembalikan kepada KAMRULLAHBB No.310: 1 (satu) bundel
Register : 23-09-2016 — Putus : 08-06-2017 — Upload : 10-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 32 P/HUM/2016
Tanggal 8 Juni 2017 — BUDI SANTOSO, SH., LLM., Pd.D., DKK vs PRESIDEN RI;
130302 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • (ii)Signing, cara menggunakan bahasa atau gambar untukmengemas pesan, dan; (ili) Priming, cara mengatur tempat(place) dan waktu (timing) untuk menyampaikan pesantentang PT TASPEN (Persero) dan program programnya.Perlu ditekankan bahwa pembawa pesan advokasi adalahpersonil yang ditugaskan untuk melakukan presentasilangsung kepada kelompok sasaran;d. Analisis pesan advokasi.
Putus : 05-12-2018 — Upload : 27-05-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2633 K/PID.SUS/2018
Tanggal 5 Desember 2018 — NUR ALAM
15171422 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Billy Indonesia kepada Richcorp InternationalTahun 2013 beserta lampirannya;Dikembalikan kepada Distomy Lasimon;BB Nomor 308: 5 (lima) lembar fotocopy Contract For Purchase &Sale Of Nickel Ore Contract Nomor 054/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date:Dec 9,2013 Seller: PT. Billy Indonesia Buyer: Well Victory InternationalLimited;BB Nomor 309: 5 (lima) lembar fotocopy Contract For Purchase &Sale Of Nickel Ore Contract Nomor 056/BIWVIL/XII/2013 Signing date:Dec 16,2013 Seller: PT.
Putus : 11-06-2010 — Upload : 21-12-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2606 K/Pdt/2009
Tanggal 11 Juni 2010 — YUM BUM SOO,dkk vs GU JONG YUL, dkk
12591 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • I dan Penggugat Rekonvensi II selaku Para Pemegang Saham baru diTurut Tergugat I, Oleh karenanya Para Tergugat Rekonvensi telah menerimapembayaran harga jual sahamsaham sebesar US$ 300,000.00 (tiga ratus ribuDollar Amerika Serikat).Hal ini disebutkan secara jelas dalam Sale And Purchase of Shares Agreement,Akta No. 49 Tanggal 30 Juli 2004, dibuat di hadapan Turut Tergugat II, (BuktiTI21) dalam Pasal 2 a sebagai berikut:(a) US$ 300,000 (three hundred thousand United States Dollars) payable atthe signing
Register : 14-11-2019 — Putus : 18-12-2019 — Upload : 19-12-2019
Putusan PT PALEMBANG Nomor 131/PDT/2019/PT PLG
Tanggal 18 Desember 2019 — Pembanding/Tergugat I : Muhammad Rofiq
Terbanding/Penggugat : BUDI OKTARITA
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat : Notaris Dian Saraswati, SH
Turut Terbanding/Tergugat II : BANK MUAMALAT CABANG UTAMA PALEMBANG
18789
  • KEPADATERGUGAT II21.Bahwa hal ini diungkapkan Penggugat dalam Posita 32 Gugatan,bahwa Penggugat merasa dirugikan karena harus membayar sisautang kepada Tergugat II;22.Bahwa agar menjadi pengingat dan perhatian Penggugat, bahwacontracting party (pihak yang berkontrak) pada PerjanjianAlMudharabah adalah Tergugat II dan Koperasi, sehingga memangsepatutnya akan terus mengikat Koperasi meskipun telah bergantisusunan kepengurusan.23.Bahwa Tergugat bukan satusatunya yang bertindak mewakiliKoperasi sebagai signing
Register : 10-06-2021 — Putus : 30-08-2021 — Upload : 16-09-2021
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 291/PDT/2021/PT DKI
Tanggal 30 Agustus 2021 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. IKHWAN MEGA POWER Diwakili Oleh : PT. IKHWAN MEGA POWER
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. BERDIKARI INSURANCE,
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. KARYA SAKTI SEJAHTERA,
245157
  • Failed to provide a valid and enforceable performance bondwithin 28 days upon signing of the Supplementary Agreement No.3 dated on 12 February 2019;2. Failed to provide when requested to extend the Advance PaymentBond that had expired on 31 March 2019. There is an outstandingof Rp. 13.401.392.000;3. Failed to provide a valid contractor all risk insurance as stipulatedin the Supplementary Agreement No. 3;4.