Ditemukan 317 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 26-05-2017 — Putus : 16-08-2017 — Upload : 16-08-2017
Putusan PT YOGYAKARTA Nomor 35/PDT/2017/PT YYK
Tanggal 16 Agustus 2017 — Ir. PANDRI PRAMADI MELAWAN F.A. PANDRI PRATIWI SULISTIJO, DKK
2816
  • UANG , karena seperti yang selama ini diketahui (yangbahkan juga dipersyaratkan oleh Penggugat sebagai salahseorang ahliwaris) adalah bahwa :(*) Uang HutangPiutang akan dihitung dan diperhitungkansecara keseluruhansekaligustuntas dan akan dibagibersamaan dengan/ atau sesudah() HartaWaris Benda Tetap ataupun harta warislainnyasecara keseluruhan (Whole/NonParsial).Juga harus disadari sepenuhnya bahwa para pihakahliwaris (Penggugat dan para Tergugat) pada saat ini tidakmempunyai dana yang cukup untuk
Putus : 07-07-2015 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 134 PK/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 7 Juli 2015 — 1. IRWIN IDROES, dkk lawan 1. RUSNIMAN, dk
5020 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Law enforcement is a part of a whole legal system. The material recht willbecome "een papiren muur" without the law enforcement. Therefore, weneed an accountable legal system a support the effort of lawenforcement. Thus, a legal system mustbe independent and besupported by professional lawyers (Penegakan hukum adalah bagian darisistem hukum Tanpa penegak hukum, maka kaidahkaidah hokummateriil niscaya menjadi tumpukan kertas saja.
Putus : 30-11-2015 — Upload : 16-06-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 842 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 30 Nopember 2015 — PT. HYATT INDONESIA vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
13398 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • A more complex analysis is necessary where an associated enterpriseundertakes activities that relate to more than one member of the group or to thegroup as a whole. In a narrow range of such cases, an intragroup activity maybe performed relating to group members even though those group members donot need the activity (and would not be willing to pay for it were theyindependent enterprises).
Register : 15-01-2020 — Putus : 17-02-2020 — Upload : 26-08-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 443 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 17 Februari 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
15526 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic repaidee soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper.
Putus : 15-12-2010 — Upload : 12-11-2012
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2056 K/Pdt/2010
Tanggal 15 Desember 2010 — GAZI MINABARI VS DJAMAL ALKATIRI
3117 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Law enforcement is a part of a whole legal system. The material rechtwill become "een paperen muur" without the law enforcement.Therefore, we need a accountable legal system to support the effort oflaw enforcement. Thus, a legal system must be independent and besupported by professional lawyers (Penegakan hukum adalah bagiandari system hukum. Tanpa penegak hukum, maka kaidahkaidahhukum materiil niscaya menjadi tumpuan kertas saja.
Register : 15-01-2020 — Putus : 17-02-2020 — Upload : 26-08-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 464 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 17 Februari 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
14430 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a anal piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the u per shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the Foot.
Putus : 29-04-2014 — Upload : 24-03-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 44 PK/Ag/2013
Tanggal 29 April 2014 — 1. Rd. GIAT SOEGIAT bin R. KING SOEKARTIN, DKK VS 1. Rd. Hj. SRI MULYANI binti R. KING SOEKARTIN, DKK
2817 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Bandung No. 145/Pdi/2010/PT.A.Bdg, tanggal 3 Desember 2010 dan Putusan KasasiNo. 281 K/AG/2011 tanggal 18 Agustus 2011;Law enforcement is a part of a whole legal system. The material recht willbecome een papiren muur wthout the law enforcement.
Register : 14-12-2009 — Putus : 30-11-2010 — Upload : 18-07-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 1516/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 30 Nopember 2010 —
192118
  • Company to Indah, an to equal the whole of suchdividend.
    Company to payNewmont the whole of each dividend to which Indah is estitled ;Terjemahan :PT Pukuafu Indah akan memberikan perintah yang tidak dapat ditarikkembali kepada PT.
Register : 20-07-2020 — Putus : 28-09-2020 — Upload : 02-08-2021
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3541 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 28 September 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
24143 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic sacked soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the Spee shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Putus : 30-01-2020 — Upload : 08-07-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 463/B/PK/Pjk/2020
Tanggal 30 Januari 2020 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
30858 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic guided soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and 9 of the foot.
Putus : 23-06-2016 — Upload : 21-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1202 K/PDT/2016
Tanggal 23 Juni 2016 — YOHAN MARAMIS VS JUSTIN LENI MARAMIS, dk.
8552 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Law enforcement is a part of a whole legal system. The material recht willbecome "een paperen muur" without the law enforcement. Therefore, weneed a accountable legal system to support the effort of lawenforcement. Thus, a legal system must be independent and besupported by professional lawyers;Halaman 22 dari 26 hal. Put. Nomor 1202 K/Pdt/2016(Penegakan hukum adalah bagian dart system hukum. Tanpa penegakhukum, maka kaidahkaidah hukum materiil niscaya menjadi tumpuankertas saja.
Register : 27-04-2020 — Putus : 16-06-2020 — Upload : 23-06-2020
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 386/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps
Tanggal 16 Juni 2020 — Penuntut Umum:
Ni Luh Wayan Adhi Antari, SH
Terdakwa:
Benny Handoko
9950
  • Blue Chese SO pecs 2,887,500.00:5 SNIT Weet bix kids 375 pr 5 pcs 291,500.006 LOT Whole Almond 100 gr 12 pes 587,400.00Fr LDT Excell Sea Salt 100 gr 12 pecs 673,200.00B LOT Excell 70 % 100 gr 12 pes 673,200.00> ARL Mozarela Chese Sreded 7 pcs 446,600.00Lo SMT Sanitarium Unswetened 15. pcs. 239,250.00:11 LRZ Pompstik Salted 15 pcs. 297,000.0012 LOT Grand Almod Milk 150 gr 15 pes 734,250.0013, Petit Chocolate Collection 15. pcs 858,000.0014 ARL Mozarela Chese Sreded LO pecs 638,000.0015 Canola 1 ltr
    tanggal 21 Desember 2018 dengan jumlah keseluruhan kurang lebihsebesar Rp. 34.279.035, (tiga puluh empat juta dua ratus tujuh puluhsembilan ribu tiga puluh lima rupiah), dengan rincian sebagai berikut :Halaman 8 dari 52 PutusanNomor 386/Pid.B/2020/PN Dps No tel Peminjaman Nama Barang Oty Nominala 13Nov18 Blue Chese 5:0 pcs 2, 887,500.0013Nov18 Blue Chese SO pes 2,887,500.00= 13Nov18 Blue Chese 50 pcs 2, 887,500.004 13Nov18 Blue Chese 50 pes 2,887,500.005 SNT Weet bix kids 375 pr 5 pcs 291,500.006 LDT Whole
Register : 15-01-2020 — Putus : 17-02-2020 — Upload : 26-08-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 465 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 17 Februari 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
15933 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded : soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.
Register : 12-05-2020 — Putus : 12-06-2020 — Upload : 15-06-2020
Putusan PT BANDUNG Nomor 175/PID/2020/PT BDG
Tanggal 12 Juni 2020 — Pembanding/Terbanding/Penuntut Umum : Melur K,SH
Terbanding/Pembanding/Terdakwa : BRYAN JHON SATYA ANDRISTIAN Bin CHRISTIAN PIERRE LODEWYK TAMBENGI
15785
  • pada tanggal 08 Mei 2019, 18Mei 2019, 24 Mei 2019, 15 Juni 2019, 17 s/d 23 Juni 2019, 24 Juni 2019, 9 s/d15 Juli 2019 dan tanggal 17 s/d 22 Juli 2019 atau setidaktidaknya pada suatuwaktu masih dalam bulan Mei sampai dengan Juli tahun 2019 atau setidaktidaknya masih dalam tahun 2019, bertempat di Caf Lee Marley Jalan CitarumKota Bandung, Rumah Makan Jepang Royal Kashimura Jalan Lombok KotaBandung, Trans Studio Mall Jalan Gatot Subroto Kota Bandung, Hotel HarrisJalan Peta Kota Bandung, Lotte Mart Whole
Putus : 27-02-2020 — Upload : 06-07-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 520/B/PK/Pjk/2020
Tanggal 27 Februari 2020 — PT QUEEN PACIFIC SUKSESABADI vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
5616 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic moulded soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the Poot.
Putus : 20-04-2015 — Upload : 18-09-2015
Putusan PN KUTAI BARAT Nomor 18/Pdt.G/2014/PN Sdw
Tanggal 20 April 2015 — PT. BUNGA ARAFAT (Sebagai Penggugat) Melawan 1. PT. MANOOR BULATN LESTARI (MBL) (sebagai Tergugat) 2. PT. ASURANSI UMUM BUMIPUTERA MUDA 1967 (BUMIDA) (sebagai Turut Tergugat)
18688
  • Notice to Correct) ;b) abandons the Works or otherwise plainly demonstrates theintention not to continue performance of his obligations underthe Contract 220222 n nnn nnn nn nn nn nnnc) without reasonable excuse fails to proceed with the Works inaccorndacne with Clause 8 (Commencement, Delays andSUSPENSION) =n nn nn nnn nnn nn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnnd)e)f)subcontracts the whole of the Works or assigns the Contractwithout the required agreement ;becomes bankrupt or insolvent, goes into liquidation, has
Register : 29-04-2020 — Putus : 07-07-2020 — Upload : 08-08-2021
Putusan PN SAMARINDA Nomor 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Smr
Tanggal 7 Juli 2020 — Penuntut Umum:
AGUS WIRYADI, SH.MH.
Terdakwa:
Ferry Yanuar Saefullah Bin Saiful Anwar
278
  • Pekerjaan : Karyawan Swasta (whole Saller di PT.KoreaTommorow & Global Indonesia)Terdakwa Ferry Yanuar Saefullah Bin Saiful Anwar ditahan dalam tahanan rutanoleh:1. Penyidik sejak tanggal 21 Februari 2020 sampai dengan tanggal 11 Maret2020Terdakwa Ferry Yanuar Saefullah Bin Saiful Anwar ditahan dalam tahanan rutanoleh:2.
Putus : 24-06-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 88/B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 24 Juni 2015 — PT. HYATT INDONESIA vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
4940 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • A more complex analysis is necessary where an associated enterpriseundertakes activities that relate to more than one member of the group or to thegroup as a whole. In a narrow range of such cases, an intragroup activity may beperformed relating to group members even though those group members do notneed the activity (and would not be willing to pay for it were they independententerprises). Such an activity would be one that a group member (usually theHalaman 8 dari 27 halaman.
Register : 13-07-2020 — Putus : 28-09-2020 — Upload : 02-08-2021
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3460 B/PK/PJK/2020
Tanggal 28 September 2020 — PT. ALASINDO MAKMUR VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
20633 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic henided: soles or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the upper shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and Ne of the foot.
Putus : 17-02-2020 — Upload : 07-07-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 225/B/PK/Pjk/2020
Tanggal 17 Februari 2020 — PT ALASINDO MAKMUR vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI
5925 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • However, in certain footwear with plastic eeanlied soles. or in shoes of theAmerican Indian moccasin type, a single piece of material is used to form the sole andeither the whole or part of the upper, thus making it difficult to identify the demarcationbetween the outer sole and the upper. In such cases, the wu per shall be considered to be thatportion of the shoe which covers the sides and top of the foot.