Ditemukan 37 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 28-01-2010 — Putus : 20-12-2010 — Upload : 30-06-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 161/Pdt.G/2010/PN.JKT.SEL.
Tanggal 20 Desember 2010 —
23964
  • Lessee agrees that Lessor shall beentitled to commingle the Deposit with Lessors general or other funds,Lessor will not hold any such funds as agent or on trust for Lessee or inany similar fiduciary capacity and Lessees right to a refund of theDeposit amount is limited as set out in the Lease.If Lessee fails to comply with any provision of the Lease or the OtherAgreements, or any Default shall have occurred and be continuing, inaddition to all rights and remedies accorded to Lessor elsewhere in theLease
Register : 28-01-2010 — Putus : 20-12-2010 — Upload : 26-05-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 163/Pdt.G/2010/PN.JKT.SEL.-
Tanggal 20 Desember 2010 —
190124
  • Lessee agrees that Lessor shall beentitled to commingle the Deposit with Lessors general or other funds,Lessor will not hold any such funds as agent or on trust for Lessee or inany similar fiduciary capacity and Lessees right to a refund of theDeposit amount is limited as set out in the Lease.If Lessee fails to comply with any provision of the Lease or the OtherAgreements, or any Default shall have occurred and be continuing, inaddition to all rights and remedies accorded to Lessor elsewhere in theLease
Register : 28-04-2017 — Putus : 24-05-2017 — Upload : 13-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1012 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 24 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SIKA INDONESIA;
3323 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • lebihperusahaan yang tersebar diseluruh dunia; Bahwa IT Services yangdiberikan adalah general ITServices, negotiating andcoordination of global SoftwareLicence contracts, projectsupport, process support,definition of Standards;(Software, Security etc), WebServices, Hosting of Serversand Networks, Networkservices, desk site support andtelecommunication Services,building up and runningcorporate solutions which arevital to all Sika Groupcompanies; Bahwa Intellectual Propertyberupa hak, title and interest inany
Register : 17-11-2015 — Putus : 18-02-2016 — Upload : 14-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1181 B/PK/PJK/2015
Tanggal 18 Februari 2016 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. SIKA INDONESIA;
5239 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1181/B/PK/PJK/2015definition of Standards; (Software, Security etc), WebServices, Hosting of Servers and Networks, Networkservices, desk site support and telecommunicationservices, building up and running corporate solutions whichare vital to all Sika Group companies;Bahwa Intellectual Property berupa hak, title and interest inany findings, reports, inventions, writings, disclosures,discoveries, computer code, developments andimprovements yang ditulis, diciptakan, dibuat atau disusunoleh
Register : 07-08-2019 — Putus : 24-09-2019 — Upload : 26-09-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 452/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 24 September 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : Perusahaan Pelayaran Asia Mandiri Lines
Terbanding/Tergugat : Marina Bay Shipping B.V
10256
  • Inany event, however, we do not consider that the Buyers could rely onthe statemen that the Vessel was built in 1990 (assuming that its wasincorrect, which it was not) since they were provided with informationshowingthat the keel was laid in 1975 so that they must haverealised that there was something unsual about the construction ofthe Vessel...
Register : 13-06-2019 — Putus : 12-08-2019 — Upload : 11-11-2020
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 320/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 12 Agustus 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT DUNIA RETAIL INDONESIA Diwakili Oleh : Dony Putra SH MH
Terbanding/Tergugat : PT MULIA INTIPELANGI
323289
  • otherwise exclude entry to theLessee and any other persons the Lessor may deem necessary toexclude and take control of any and all of the Lessees property andother contents of the Demised Premises, and if it Seems desirable to theLessor, sell such contents, or any part thereof (except as otherwisespecified in Clause 8.2.5 herein) to whatever purchaser at whateverprice the Lessor may deem suitable, provided no higher price is beingoffered, or otherwise move or remove such contents and store them inany
Putus : 23-03-2016 — Upload : 15-09-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1830 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 23 Maret 2016 — PT. FEGA INDOTAMA lawan LVMH FRAGRANCES & COSMETICS (Singapore) PTE. LTD
432380 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Jakarta yang sematamata bertujuan untuk menutupi bahwa gugatan aquo adalah gugatanperbuatan melawan hukum sehingga dengan demikian Pengadilan NegeriJakarta Pusat berhak memeriksa perkara aquo;Lebih lanjut berdasarkan International Arbitration Act (Chapter 143A)Section 6 (1) menyatakan sebagai berikut:Wotwthstanding Article 8 of the Model Law, were any party to anarbitration agreement to wich this Act applies institutes any proceedings inany court against any other party to the agreement in respect
Register : 13-10-2014 — Putus : 02-04-2015 — Upload : 18-08-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA UTARA Nomor 413/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.UTR.
Tanggal 2 April 2015 —
14069
  • dispute, suit, action or proceedings(including applications for injunctive or other temporaryreliefs) which may arise out of or in connection with this Agreement (Proceedings).Accordingly, each party hereto irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of such courtsand waives any objection to Proceedings in such courts whether on the ground of venueor on the ground that the Proceedings have been brought in an inconvenient forum.PROVIDED THAT the Franchisor expressly reserves the right to bring Proceedings inany
Putus : 31-08-2015 — Upload : 28-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 601 K/Pdt/2015
Tanggal 31 Agustus 2015 — NINE AM Ltd. VS PT. BANGUN KARYA PRATAMA LESTARI
14031638 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ofAssociation, (ii) is not in default in any materialrespect which such would affect the performance bythe Borrower of its obligations under this Agreement,and no event has occurred which, with notice orlapse of time or both, would constitute such a defaultin the due performance or observance of any term,covenant or condition contained in any otheragreement, contract or instrument to which it is aparty or by which it is bound or to which any of itsproperty or assets is subject, (iii) has not violated inany
Register : 10-01-2017 — Putus : 13-03-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 184 B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 13 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. FREEPORT INDONESIA;
6649 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Explanatory Guide;1995; Oliver Horrison7 Pricing policy harga jualkonsentrat yaitu LME/LBM TC/RC Price Participation +/unsur lainnya) menunjukkanbahwa harga jual bukan hargamati yang tidak dapatdisesuaikan nilainya sehinggaseharusnya TermohonPeninjauan Kembali melakukanpenyesuaian harga atasperbedaan kondisi yang ada.7 Penerapan penyesuaian hargaatas perbedaan kondisi yangada oleh Pemohon PeninjauanKembali tersebut telah sesuaidengan ketentuan dalam pasal11. angka 4 Kontrak Karyakhususnya pada ketentuan Inany
Register : 08-10-2019 — Putus : 16-12-2019 — Upload : 18-12-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 623/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 16 Desember 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : SUMATRA PARTNERS LLC Diwakili Oleh : YUNILLA NURHALIM SH LL M
Terbanding/Tergugat I : MARDJONO REKSODIPUTRO
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Ricky S Nazir
Terbanding/Tergugat III : EMIR NURMANSYAH
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : NAFIS ADWANI
Terbanding/Tergugat V : RITA TYASTUTI TAUFIK
Terbanding/Tergugat VI : AGUS AHADI DERADJAT
Terbanding/Tergugat VII : WOODY PANANTO
Terbanding/Tergugat VIII : CHANDRAWATI DEWI
Terbanding/Tergugat IX : LUKY I WALALANGI
Terbanding/Tergugat X : SAHAT M SIAHAAN
Terbanding/Tergugat XI : HERRY NURYANTO KURNIAWAN
Terbanding/Tergugat XII : Nurdin Adiwibowo
Terbanding/Tergugat XIII : FREDDY KARYADI
Terbanding/Tergugat XIV : Yanny M. Suryaretina
Terbanding/Tergugat XV : Ayik Chandrawulan Gunadi
Terbanding/Tergugat XVI : KEVIN OMAR SIDHARTA
Terbanding/Tergugat XVII : Indra Setiawan
Terbanding/Tergugat XVIII : Miriam Andreta
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat I : PT Bangun Karya Pratama Lestari BKPL
Terbanding/Turut Tergugat II
8722783
  • If BKPL uses the Woeker Ordonantie argument inany of the dispute with the Lenders, and the Court considers that theapplication of the Woeker Ordonantie cannot be waived by the parties,such waiver would not be effective. However, the Lenders may file alawsuit against BKPL for breach of its contractual obligation under theLoan Agreement;Terjemahan :Klausul 10 (g) (viii)Jaminan Fidusia hanya akan berlaku setelah didaftarkan pada kantorpendaftaran fidusia.
Register : 19-07-2016 — Putus : 02-11-2016 — Upload : 22-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 27 P/HUM/2016
Tanggal 2 Nopember 2016 — AISYA ALDILA, DKK VS PRESIDEN RI;
9981734 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • MSW incineration projects are immediately applicable only if the following overall criteria arefulfilled:A mature and wellfunctioning waste management system has been in place for a number of years;Solid waste is disposed of at controlled and well operated landfills;The supply of combustible waste will be stable and amount to at least 50.000 metric tons per year;The lower calorific value must on average be at least 7 MJ/kg and must never fall below 6 MJ/kg inany season;The community is willing to
Putus : 16-04-2014 — Upload : 17-06-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1927 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 16 April 2014 — STANDARD CHARTERED BANK, CABANG JAKARTA VS PT. TOBU INDONESIA STEEL
158108 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • as if party A and party B execute anagreement in such form (but wthout any schedule except for thefollowng elections : (a) English Law shall be the governing law, (b)United States Dolars shall be the Termination currency, and (c) thecross default provisions of section 5 (a) shall apply o both parties andthe threshold amount wth respect to each party shall be threepercent (3%) of such party's networth (as disclosed in the mostrecent audited financial statements of such party) or it's equivalent inany
Register : 02-01-2015 — Putus : 18-02-2015 — Upload : 03-07-2019
Putusan PT BANJARMASIN Nomor 2/PID.TPK/2015/PT BJM
Tanggal 18 Februari 2015 — Pembanding/Jaksa Penuntut : Windhu Sugiarto, SH, MH
Terbanding/Terdakwa : H.HAIRIL MUCHLIS BIN (ALM) H.ABDUL HAMID
6953
  • ALFIAN INANY, FATHIMATUZAHRRA, S.Hut, MP, ANWARI, RIRIN SYUKHAIRINA, ZAIN ARAFAT, Ir. H. SYAIFUL BAHRI, MM, H. MASERANI untuk pembayaran biaya pinjaman modal kegiatan pembibitan kayu manis tahun 2009;
  • Kwitansi terima dari an. AKHMAD SIRAJUDDIN untuk pembayaran biaya pinjaman modal kegiatan pembibitan kayu manis bansos Ditjenbun tahun 2009;
  • Kwitansi terima dari an.
Putus : 26-02-2008 — Upload : 19-08-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1713K/PDT/2007
Tanggal 26 Februari 2008 — PT BANK MIZUHO INDONESIA ; MORGAN STANLEY & Co. INCORPORATED, dkk. ; INDAH KIAT INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY BV ; BANK AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, dkk.
317269 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Guarantor, as thecase may be, is subject by a suit upon such judgment or in anyHal. 73 dari 376 hal.Put.No. 1713 K/Pdt/2007manner provided by law, provided that service of process iseffected upon the Issuer or the Guarantor, as the case may be,in the manner specified in the following subsection or asotherwise permitted by law;As long as any of the Notes remain Outstanding, each of theIssuer and the Guarantor will at all times have an authorizedagent in New York City, upon whom process may be served inany
    Each of the Issuer and theGuarantor agrees that final judgment in any such suit,action or proceeding brought in such a court shall beconclusive and binding upon the Issuer or the Guarantor,as the case may be ant to the extend pumitted byapplicable law, may be enforced in any court to thejurisdiction of which the Issuer or the Guarantor, as thecese may be, is subject by a suit upon such judgment or inany manner provided by law, provided that service ofprocess is effected upon the Issuer or the Guarantor
Putus : 07-01-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 338 PK/Pdt/2014
Tanggal 7 Januari 2015 — MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATE VS APP INTERNASIONAL FINANCE COMPANY B.V, DKK
550403 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 338 PK/Pdt/2014memperkuat fakta hukum bahwa Pengadilan Negara Bagian NewYork merupakan forum yang paling sesuai untuk menyelesaikansengketa a quo;Bagian XI. halaman 31 dari Underwriting Agreement menyatakan:"Each of the Issuer and the Guarantor (a) agrees that any legal suit,action or proceeding brought by the Underwriter arising out of orrelating to this Agreement, any Indenture, the Notes or thetransactions contemplated hereby or thereby may be instituted inany federal or state court
Putus : 20-09-2016 — Upload : 02-06-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2696 K/Pid.Sus/2015
Tanggal 20 September 2016 — I KADEK BUDIARTAWAN
11571 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 2696 K/Pid.SUS/2015 oon oon oooSer 0e0e meg) FbUngp beng 08'E ula 83 000 O00 DL Ser oo0 ob Wee phuas wnany UINLeR IE Gumdepag WJWIR HY SER IMneg FEEL bEDERrEL i 08's uid 83 ood oone Gerpo0e Weg phuas wn any UIPTLEB ay WW) TY UebueR atWang FURAUpEE PEs yb bud i 08's ule Fo merooo9 merpo0's Wee pouas inany Burg ore yep URWOAR E ttmuRg FiadyLb bude 08'E uid 83 mer ooo ds merpo0 0s 188 nous inant JRA Gugdepeg HG WOKeRyes) STUae"ueg EbadyLb bude 80's ule Fo mer ooo9 Gerpo0s ea pours yang ) RS eWapeg