ExpatriateIndividuals who are employed or engaged byContractor or its Contractors or Affiliates and whoremain in Indonesia for more than ninety (90) days inthe aggregate within any calendar year shall be liablein Indonesia for personal income tax. The income ofsuch Expatriate Individuals taxable in Indonesia shallinclude only remuneration paid to them for servicesrendered in Indonesia ;c.

Hal ini dapat dilihat pada Pasal 1mengenai Definitions (Definisi), halaman 31, paragraph ke2 PerjanjianKredit Sindikasi No. 159 (vide Bukti P1) yang berbunyi sebagai berikut:Scheduled Completion Date: means the date that Project Completion isrequired to occur pursuant to this Agreement, which date shall be notlater than the 31st (thirty first) day of December 1996 (one thousand ninehundred and ninety six), unless the Majority Lenders otherwise agree inwriting.Dengan terjemahan dalam Bahasa Indonesia

,LL.M., Notary Public in Jakarta (Amendment I No. 19) (Exhibit P2)under which Syndicated Creditors agreed to convert an amount of CreditFacility provided under Syndicated Credit Facility Agreement No 159 (seeExhibit P1) to be a total amount of US$ 31,498,967.25 (thirty one millionfour hundred ninety eight thousand nine hundred sixty seven United StatesDollar and twenty five cents);3 Whereas Plaintiff is the new syndicated creditors in place of SyndicatedCreditors under Syndicated Credit Facility

(three hundred ninety threethousand five hundred ninety five United States Dollar), not amounting toUS$ 550,309. as stated by CoDefendant (see Exhibit P13);Whereas to ensure amount of cost overrun incurred for Cilacap Flour MillProject, CoDefendant requested Price Waterhouse Coopers (WPC), anindependent accountant public, to audit and valuate the amount of costoverrun arising out from the up to 4 (four) months delay of the flour millproject development and operation.Whereas the result of PWC's audit

Fotokopi Kutipan Akta Nikah ...... 00.0... tettereeeeereee DUKtE Pse nn sun women a ninety sons sacvm Wea 6 womb ene at + wd no OLA 4 A enn + RH on tne Nnmaenamane wun 9 onan en dst:B. Saksi:Zulhendri bin M. Latip, umur 34 tahun, agama Islam, pekerjaan Swasta,Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, alamat R.T. 005, R.W.002, Dusun Jumbak,Kecamatan Jujuhan, Kabupaten Bungo sebagai Pemohon ;Ruaida binti M.

Gorontalo mobil yang saat itu di tumpangioleh Saksi Tomi Laisa Alias Omi, Saksi Dedi Muslim dan Saksi Igrifan HasanAlias Ifan (di lakukan penuntutan secara terpisah) berhenti di depan Mini MarketMari Mart Kota Gorontalo lalu mereka bertiga turun dari mobil dan Saksi TomiSyarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutan secara terpisah) juga berhentitepatnya di depan Mini Market Mari Mart Kota Gorontalo.Selanjutnya Saksi Tomi Syarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutan secaraterpisah) menuju Caf Ninety

Menjatuhkan pidana kepada Terdakwa oleh karena itu dengan pidana penjara selama 1 (satu) tahun dan 10 (sepuluh) bulan;

panjang warna abu-abu;

(satu) lembar kain panjang warna coklat corak batik;

Menetapkan barang bukti berupa :

- 1(satu) unit truk mitsubishi fuso warna orange BE 9430 AD ;

- 1(satu) buah handphone merk nokia warna hitam ;

- 1(satu) buah baju kaos lengan pendek warna hitam bertuliskan freestyle ;

- 1(satu) buah baju kaos lengan pendek warna coklat bertuliskan goshiki jeans ;

- 1(satu) buah kaos singlet warna putih merk hings ;

- 1(satu) buah baju kaos lengan pendek warna hitam bertuliskan ninety est 7 ;

Dedi Muslim dan terdakwa berhenti didepan MiniMarket Mari Mart Kota Gorontalo lalu mereka bertiga turun dari mobil dansaksi Tomi Syarif Hasan alias Syarif (dilakukan penuntutan secaraterpisah) juga berhenti tepatnya di depan Mini Market Mari Mart KotaGorontalo dan memarkir sepeda motor miliknya dan menanyakan kepadaterdakwa baru Fan , dan dijawab oleh terdakwa lyo Pangge kamari jo,tapi hatihati ngana;Selanjutnya saksi Tomi Syarif Hasan alias Syarif (dilakukan penuntutansecara terpisah) menuju Caf Ninety

Mart Kota Gorontalo lalu mereka bertiga turun dari mobil danSaksi Tomi Syarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutan secaraHalaman 11 dari 131 Putusan Nomor 153/Pid.B/2015/PN Gtoterpisah) juga berhenti tepatnya di depan Mini Market Mari Mart KotaGorontalo dan memarkir sepeda motor miliknya dan menanyakan kepadaTerdakwa Baru Fan, dan di jawab oleh Terdakwa /yo Pangge kamariJo, tapi hati hati ngana.Selanjutnya Saksi Tomi Syarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutansecara terpisah) menuju Caf Ninety

Muslim dan Terdakwa berhenti di depan MiniMarket Mari Mart Kota Gorontalo lalu mereka bertiga turun dari mobil danSaksi Tomi Syarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutan secaraterpisah) juga berhenti tepatnya di depan Mini Market Mari Mart KotaGorontalo dan memarkir sepeda motor miliknya dan menanyakan kepadaTerdakwa Baru Fan, dan di jawab oleh Terdakwa /yo Pangge kamariJo, tapi hati hati ngana.Selanjutnya Saksi Tomi Syarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutansecara terpisah) menuju Caf Ninety

Muslim dan Terdakwa berhenti di depan MiniMarket Mari Mart Kota Gorontalo lalu mereka bertiga turun dari mobil danSaksi Tomi Syarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutan secaraterpisah) juga berhenti tepatnya di depan Mini Market Mari Mart KotaGorontalo dan memarkir sepeda motor miliknya dan menanyakan kepadaTerdakwa Baru Fan, dan di jawab oleh Terdakwa lyo Pangge kamarijo, tapi hathati ngana .Selanjutnya Saksi Tomi Syarif Hasan Alias Syarif (di lakukan penuntutansecara terpisah) menuju Caf Ninety

Pada saat pembelian MEB tersebut, nilai obligasi dicatatdalam Buku Besar Pemohon Banding sebesar Rp228.625.000.000 (USD 25,000,000 x Rp 9.145);Bahwa adapun isi perjanjian Secured Mandatory Exchangeable BondSubscription (MEB Subscription) selengkapnya dapat kamisampaikan sebagai berikut:Issue Date : 18 December 2006;Exchange Shares : 1,182,053,593 (one billion one hundredeighty two million fifty (three thousand fivehundred and ninety three) shares of PTMobile8 Telecom Tbk. with nominal valueof Rp

In the event that BOTH PARTIES fail to achieve a settlementagreement after 90 (ninety) calendars DAYS of negotiation, BOTHPARTIES agreed to settle the disputes at the Indonesian NationalArbitrary Agency (BANI) in Jakarta.4. The conclusion/decree of BANI shall be final and become binding toBOTH PARTIES.(terjemahan bebas):7. Perjanjian ini dibuat dan tunduk pada hukum yang berlaku di RepublikIndonesia.2.

In the event that BOTH PARTIES fail to achieve a settlementagreement after 90 (ninety) calendar DAYS of negotiation, BOTHPARTIES agreed to settle the dispute at the Indonesian NationalArbitrary Agency (BANI) in Jakarta.4. The conclusion/decree of BANI shall be final and become binding toBOTH PARTIES;Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia oleh Penterjemah Tersumpah:PASAL 23HUKUM YANG BERLAKU DAN PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN1. PERJANJIAN ini dibuat dan mengacu pada hukum RepublikIndonesia.2.

In the event that BOTH PARTIES fail to achieve a settlement agreement after90 (ninety) calendars DAYS of negotiation, BOTH PARTIES agreed to settlethe disputes at the Indonesian National Arbitrary Agency (BANI) in Jakarta.4. The conclusion/decree of BANI shall be final and become binding to BOTHPARTIES.Terjemahan bebas:7. Perjanjian ini dibuat dan tunduk pada hukum yang berlaku di RepublikIndonesia.2.

Nomor 3370 K/Pdt/201613.14.the President Directors of the Lessor and the Lessee within ninety (90) daysof either party requesting in writing a meeting to settle the relevant dispute,shall be submitted to binding arbitration in Singapore at the SingaporeInternational Arbitration Centre (SIAC) or elsewhere as agreed by the partiesunder the rules for arbitration of the SIAC in force at such time and ifaccordance with the provisions of this article 14.

Any dispute between the Parties arising out of this Agreement or any14.2.14.3.of the related agreements which cannot first be settled by thePresident Directors of the Lessor and the Lessee within ninety (90)days of either Party requesting in writing a meeting to settle therelevant dispute, shall be submitted to binding arbitration in Singaporeat the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC) or elsewhereas agreed by the Parties under the rules for Arbitration of the SIAC Inforce at such time

represented byDefendant II is null and void by law; Menghukum Tergugat dan Tergugat II untuk membayarkembali uang yang telah diterimanya kepada ParaPenggugat sebesar US$195.000.00 (seratus sembilan puluhlima ribu Dollar Amerika);Ditambah dengan bunga sebesar 6% (enam persen) setahunterhitung mulai tanggal 5 April 2007 sampai dengandibayarnya kepada Penggugat;To order Defendant and Defendant II to pay back the moneythey received to the Plaintiffs in the amount of US $ 195,000.00(one hundred and ninety

decided by the Supreme Council of the Supreme Court of theRepublic of Indonesia on October 8, 2018 in conjunction with thecontents of the Decision on Cassation Case No.1871 K/ PDT / 2016dated which has been was decided by the Supreme Court of theRepublic of Indonesia on October 17, 2016 at point 4th of the Decision"In the Principal Case of the Case which contains the following:" toorder Defendant and Defendant II to pay back the money they hadreceived to the Plaintiffs of US $ 195,000.00 (one hundred ninety

represented by DefendantIl is null and void by law; Menghukum Tergugat dan Tergugat II untuk membayarkembali uang yang telah diterimanya kepada Para Penggugatsebesar US$195.000.00 (seratus sembilan puluh lima ribuDollar Amerika);Ditambah dengan bunga sebesar 6% (enam persen) setahunterhitung mulai tanggal 5 April 2007 sampai dengan dibayarnyakepada Penggugat;To order Defendant and Defendant II to pay back the money theyreceived to the Plaintiffs in the amount of US $ 195,000.00 (onehundred and ninety

beendecided by the Supreme Council of the Supreme Court of the Republic ofIndonesia on October 8, 2018 in conjunction with the contents of theDecision on Cassation Case No.1871 K / PDT / 2016 dated which hasbeen was decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia onOctober 17, 2016 at point 4th of the Decision "In the Principal Case of theCase which contains the following: to order Defendant and Defendant IIto pay back the money they had received to the Plaintiffs of US $195,000.00 (one hundred ninety

In the event that both parties fail to achieve a settlementagreement after 90 (ninety) calendars days of negotiation, both partiesagreed to settle the disputes at the Indonesian National ArbitraryAgency (BANI) in Jakarta.4. The conclusion/decree of BANI shall be final and become bindingto both parties.(terjemahan bebas:1. Perjanjian ini dibuat dan tunduk pada hukum yang berlaku diRepublik Indonesia.2.

In the event that both parties fail to achieve a settlementagreement after 90 (ninety) calendar days of negotiation, bothHalaman 18 dari 68 hal. Put. Nomor 1460 K/Pdt/2017parties agreed to settle the dispute at the Indonesian NationalArbitrary Agency (BANI) in Jakarta.;4. The conclusion/decree of BANI shall be final and becomebinding to both parties;Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia oleh Penterjemah Tersumpah:Pasal 23Hukum Yang Berlaku Dan Penyelesaian Perselisihan1.

ArbitrationCenter (SIAC);Bahwa adapun dasar diajukannya perselisihan antara Penggugat denganTergugat melalui Lembaga Arbitrase Singapura yaitu The SingaporeInternational Arbitration Center (SIAC) menurut Tergugat adalah article 14.1Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa (Lease Agreement) tanggal 30 April 2003,sebagaimana dikutip yaitu Any dispute between the parties arising out of thisagreement or any of the related agreement which cannot first be settled by thePresident Directors of the LESSOR and the LESSEE within ninety

INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTER (SIAC)UNTUK MEMERIKSA DAN MENGADILINYA;Bahwa, berdasarkan perjanjian yang telah dibuat dan ditandatangani oleh danantara Tergugat dengan Penggugat tertanggal 30 April 2003 didalam15ketentuan pasal 14 Perjanjian pada bagian Arbitrase ditegaskan sebagaiberikut :Article 14:ARBITRATION;14.114.2Any dispute between the Parties arising out of this Agreement or any ofthe related agreements which cannot first be settled by the PresidentDirectors of the LESSOR and the LESSEE within ninety

Arbitration Center (SIAC);Bahwa adapun dasar diajukannya perselisihan antara Penggugat dengan Tergugatoleh Tergugat melalui Lembaga Arbitrase Singapura yaitu The SingaporeInternational Arbitration Center (SIAC) adalah article 14.1 Perjanjian SewaMenyewa (Lease Agreement) tanggal 30 April 2003, sebagaimana dikutip yaituAny dispute between the parties arising out of this agreement or any of the relatedagreement which cannot first be settled by the President Directors of the LESSORand the LESSEE within ninety

THESINGAPORE ARBITRATION CENTER ( SIAC ) UNTUK MEMERIKSADAN MENGADILINYA.Bahwa, berdasarkan * perjanjian yang telah dibuat dan ditandatangani oleh danantara Tergugat dengan Penggugat tertanggal 30 April 2003 didalam ketentuan pasal 14 Perjanjian pada bagian Arbitrase ditegaskan sebagai berikut :Article 4 :ARBITRATION14.1 Any dispute between the Parties arising out of this Agreement or any ofthe related agreements which cannot first be settled by the PresidentDirectors of the LESSOR and the LESSEE within ninety

following manner:a) Rp3.935.686.485 (three billion nine hundred and thirty five million, sixhundred and eighty six thousand, four hundred and eighty five rupiah) of theTotal IDR Indebtedness (the IDR Conversion Debt) shall he converted into newissued shares of the Borrower to be issued pursuant to and which the Lendershall subscribe for in accordance with the terms of Clause 4 of this Agreement;b) Rp221.170.699.003 (two hundred and twenty one billion, one hundredand seventy million, six hundred and ninety

In addition to the rentalabove, LESSEE shall pay LESSOR an additional sum ofUSD95 (Ninety Five United States Dollars) per flight hour andUSD 15 (Fifteen United States Dollars) per cycle as a"Component Reserve Charge, .... The Component ReserveCharge shall be due and payable on the tenth (10th) day ofthe calendar month immediately following the month in whichthe flying of the Aircraft occurred... .;Terjemahan resmi Pasal 3.1.b.Perjanjian Sewa:BIAYA CADANGAN KOMPONEN.