Ditemukan 692 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Mungkin maksud Anda adalah : upin uton upah udin upal upen ukon upan
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus PHI
Putus : 06-05-2013 — Upload : 21-12-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 122 K/PDT.SUS-PHI/2013
Tanggal 6 Mei 2013 — RAVINDRAN VEERASAMY vs PT. AGRO INDOMAS, diwakili oleh SANJAYA UPASENA dan CHRISTOFORUS S PAKADANG selaku Wakil Presiden Direktur dan Direktur
106 — 49 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • ;c You commit an act of banckrupty or make a composition orarrangement with your creditors generally;d Youare found guilty in a criminal court of any offence of a nature likelyin the reasonable opinion of the company to affect the reputation or toprejudice the interest of the company or any related company orassociated company if you were to continue to be employed by thecompany in your appointment hereunder; ore You disobey or neglect any lawful and reasonable order or direction ofthe company, upon
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT
Register : 21-10-2014 — Putus : 22-09-2015 — Upload : 21-01-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 526/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.PST.
Tanggal 22 September 2015 —
92 — 39
  • Our client will request for this;Berthing at PT Lautan Lestari (PTLL) as your client knows is lessexpensive;Class Docking Survey of QSA 300 and necessary work thereto shouldbe done in Indonesia where it is less expensive.Our client will cause all necessary documents and trading certificatesthereafter to be sent to your office on your firms written undertaking torelease the same to an authorized party only upon the writtenagreement and direction by both our firms signed on a singledocument.
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus Persaingan Usaha
Putus : 01-09-2016 — Upload : 21-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 42 PK/Pdt.Sus-KPPU/2016
Tanggal 1 September 2016 — PT PERUSAHAAN GAS NEGARA (Persero) Tbk VS KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU)
368 — 281 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • In the second, firms agree on which firm will be thelowest bidder and rotate in such a wery that each firm wins anagreed upon number or value of contracts. Since most (but notall) contracts open to bidding involve governments, it is theywho are most often the target of bid rigging.
    Thesupplier or contractor may be disqualified if itfails to remedysuch deficiencies promptly upon request by the procuringentity";Adapun terjemahan bebasnya adalah sebagai berikut:(o) Panitia pengadaan dapat mendiskualifikasi penyedia ataukontaktor jika pada setiap saat menemukan bahwa informasiyang disampaikan terkait kualifikasi penyedia atau kontraktortersebut tidak akurat atau tidak lengkap secara material;(c) Selain daripada keadaan sebagai ketentuan dalam subayat (a) berlaku, panitia pengadaan
Pengadilan PN DENPASAR Perdata
Register : 05-04-2021 — Putus : 23-02-2022 — Upload : 23-02-2022
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 338/Pdt.G/2021/PN Dps
Tanggal 23 Februari 2022 — Penggugat:
1.I Ketut Siandana
2.I Made Sutarjana
Tergugat:
PT. WIDJA PUTRA KARYA
201 — 130
  • land lease will be extended until2057, as per the table in Appendix III.The agreed basis upon which the future lease rental has been calcualted is16% every 5 years, which is fine with the land lease agreement (1992 to2019) in the Minutes of Meeting dated 19" April, 1993.SALE AND PURCHASE OF SHARES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITYIt was decided that PT WGS will sell 10% shares to EIH for a considerationof US$ 1,800,000.US$ 300,000 will be paid by 31% March, 2007 and the balance US$1,500,000 by 30th June 2007
    The agreed basis upon which the future lease rental has been calcualted is16% every 5 years, which is fine with the land lease agreement (1992 to2019) in the Minutes of Meeting dated 19" April, 1993.SALE AND PURCHASE OF SHARES & SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY It was decided that PT WGS will sell 10% shares to EIH for a considerationof US$ 1,800,000. US$ 300,000 will be paid by 31 March, 2007 and the balance US$1,500,000 by 30th June 2007.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata Khusus PHI
Register : 29-09-2015 — Putus : 31-03-2016 — Upload : 28-06-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor : 244/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2015/ PN Jkt Pst
Tanggal 31 Maret 2016 — MARIA ITANIA SETIAWAN, CS >< KEDUTAAN BESAR REPUBLIK SURINAME (The embassy of the Republik Suriname)
248 — 220
  • Except where other appropriatearrangements exist which ensure the payment of wages at regularintervals, the intervals for the payment of wages shall be prescribed bynational laws or regulations or fixed by collective agreement or arbitrationavard.(2) Upon the termination of a contract of employment, a final settlement of allwages due shall be effected in accordance wth national laws orregulations, collective agreement or arbitration award or, in the absence ofPutusan No.244/Pdt.SusPHI/2015/PN Jkt
Pengadilan PN PELALAWAN Pidana Khusus
Register : 31-05-2021 — Putus : 28-06-2021 — Upload : 29-06-2021
Putusan PN PELALAWAN Nomor 4/Pid.Pra/2021/PN Plw
Tanggal 28 Juni 2021 — Pemohon:
JAMANATAR HUTAPEA
Termohon:
KEPALA KEPOLISIAN SEKTOR LANGGAM
75 — 45
  • Due process of law pada dasarnya bukan semata matamengenai rule of law, akan tetapi merupakan unsur yang essensial dalampenyelenggaraan peradilan yang intinya adalah bahwa ia merupakan;"..a law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds upon inquiry, andrenders judgment only after trial..". Pada dasarnya yang menjadi titik sentraladalah perlindungan hakhak asasi individu terhadap arbitrary action of thegovernment.
Pengadilan PN BANDUNG Perdata Wanprestasi
Register : 24-05-2017 — Putus : 03-05-2018 — Upload : 22-10-2019
Putusan PN BANDUNG Nomor 244/Pdt.G/2017/PN Bdg
Tanggal 3 Mei 2018 — PT. PERKEBUNAN NUSANTARA VIII LAWAN PT SINAR GALUH PRATAMA
104 — 26
  • melawan Sohandi Kawilarang yang intinyamenyatakan:Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan PengadilanTinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasanMahkamah Agung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salahmenerapkan hukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/D0/37/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diasuransikan bahwaAll differences ansing out of this policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by theparties in differences or if they cannot agree upon
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 31-05-2017 — Putus : 21-08-2017 — Upload : 24-04-2018
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 312/PDT/2017/PT.DKI
Tanggal 21 Agustus 2017 — PT.SARIPARI PERTIWI ABADI >< PT.CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA CS
161 — 95
  • ketentuan dalam Kontrak 4373OK Pasal 12.10,yang dikutip sebagai berikut:bec tee ees kegagalan Kontraktor untuk melaksanakan seluruh atausebagian dari jasajasa yang manapun dibawah kontrak ini akanmengakibatkan pelepasan hak atas uang Jaminan Pelaksanaanuntuk Keuntungan Perusahaan;Bahwa selain itu, dalam Jaminan Pelaksanaan/ PerformanceBond No. 16.9463.02.08.0472 (Bukti T7) yang dikeluarkan olehTURUT TERGUGAT pada angka 1 secara tegas menyatakan :to guarantee COMPANY to immediately pay to COMPANY,upon
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 05-01-2010 — Putus : 11-11-2010 — Upload : 26-05-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 02/Pdt.G/2010/PN.Jkt.Sel.,
Tanggal 11 Nopember 2010 — PT. PUKUAFU INDAH M E L A W A N: MARTIONO HADIANTO, MARTIONO HADIANTO,
271 — 225
  • thebenefit of the Nusa Tenggara Partnership) to transfer 7% (seven percent) oftheir shareholding in the Company, which consists of 478,384 shares, to PTPukuafu Indah, an Indonesian limited liability company, at a price to bedetermined by agreement between NIL and NTMC and the Government ofIndonesia pursuant to Article 24 of the Companys Contract of Work for the 7%interest offered by NIL and NTMC to the Government of Indonesia in March2007, provided, first that NIL/NTMC are able to agree with PTPI upon
Pengadilan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Perdata Khusus PHI
Putus : 15-09-2016 — Upload : 04-10-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 696 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2016
Tanggal 15 September 2016 — KEDUTAAN BESAR REPUBLIK SURINAME (THE EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIK SURINAME), VS 1. MARIA ITANIA SETIAWAN, DK
397 — 710 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Except where other appropriatearrangements exist which ensure the payment of wages at regularintervals, the intervals for the payment of wages shall beprescribed by national laws or regulations or fixed by collectiveagreement or arbitration award;(2) Upon the termination of a contract of employment, a finalsettlement of all wages due shall be effected in accordance withnational laws or regulations, collective agreement or arbitrationaward or, in the absence of any applicable law, regulation,agreement
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Perdata
Register : 29-07-2020 — Putus : 19-08-2021 — Upload : 20-08-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 416/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Pst
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2021 — Penggugat:
PT. Houston Steel International
Tergugat:
1.David Adrian Siqueiros
2.PT. Pentastra PasificPacific Invest
3.PT. Pentastra Pacific Invest
Turut Tergugat:
2.Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah Kota Bekasi Cq. Ika Dwi Susanti, S.H., M.Kn
3.Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Cq. Kantor Pertanahan Nasional Kota Bekasi
4.PPAT Ika Dwi Susanti, S.H., M.Kn.
5.Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia c.q. Kantor Wilayah Badan Pertanahan Nasional Wilayah Provinsi Jawa Barat c.q. Kantor Pertanahan Nasional Kota Bekasi
198 — 130
  • The awardof the arbitration shall be final and binding upon both parties."Bahwa Perjanjian Agen Eksklusif ditandatangani oleh Penggugat,dengan diwakili oleh Tergugat .
Pengadilan PN MARISA
Putus : 03-06-2015 — Upload : 12-11-2015
Putusan PN MARISA Nomor 20/PDT.G/2014/PN.MRS
Tanggal 3 Juni 2015 —
123 — 97
  • 1983(Bukti T16) menyatakan sebagai berikut :"Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasan MahkamahAgung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkanhukum.Dalam Policy No. 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 di bawahbagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa "all differencesarising out of this Policy shall be referred to the decision of anarbitrator to be appointed in writing by the parties in difference orif they cannot agree upon
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA UTARA
Register : 13-10-2014 — Putus : 02-04-2015 — Upload : 18-08-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA UTARA Nomor 413/Pdt.G/2014/PN.JKT.UTR.
Tanggal 2 April 2015 —
129 — 58
  • terhitung sejak tanggal 1Agustus 2013, 202 02 onnn nn nnn nn nn nn nn nn nena ne nen aenane nnnBahwa berdasarkan Pasal 25 Perjanjian Waralaba, setelah masa berlakuPerjanjian waralaba berakhir, maka semua hak lisensi yang telah diberikanPenggugat kepada Tergugat berdasarkan Perjanjian Waralaba menjadi berakhirpula, dan Tergugat wajib untuk menghentikan segala akitifitas usaha outletrestoran milik Tergugat yang menggunakan KR System; Pasal 25 ayat 1 dan 2 Perjanjian Waralaba menyatakan sebagai berikut:I Upon
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Perdata Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
Register : 31-07-2019 — Putus : 14-05-2020 — Upload : 12-11-2021
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 625/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 14 Mei 2020 — PT. SPIE OIL & GAS SERVICES INDONESIA, yang berkedudukan di Gedung Veteran/ Plaza Semanggi LAntai 9 Unit 005, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 50 Jakarta 12930, dalam hal ini diwakili oleh Ir. TRI HARWANTO SOEWONDO selaku Direktur Utama Perseroan, dalam hal ini diwakili oleh Kuasanya IMING MAKNAWAN TESALONIKA, SH., MM., MCL., HOTMAN SIMANUNGKALIT, SH, FIRDAUS SILALAHI, SH dan ADI MANURUNG,SH para Advokat pada Legal Counselor & Attorney-at-Law, Tesalonika & Partners, beralamat di Grand Slipi Tower Lt 16 Unit H, Jl. S. Parman, Kav. 22-24 Jakarta Barat, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tertanggal 25 Juli 2019, untuk selanjutnya disebut sebagai Penggugat; Melawan: SAMIR ABBES pemegang Passport Nomor 2C21JE11038-J kewarganegaraan Perancis yang beralamat di Jl. Cibitung III No. 4 Kel. Petogogan, Kabayoran Baru Jakarta Selatan 12170, untuk selanjutnya disebut sebagai Tergugat;
555 — 235
  • No.625/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Jkt.Sel.Employee's legally dependent children if they are living with theEmployee in the country where he is assigned;6.3 ...6.4 All travelling costs and accommodation expenses Incurredby the Employee on the Company's or Client's authorizedmission shall be reimbursed according to the rate as may bedetermined by the Company or Client upon submission of thecorresponding expenses report duly approved by the Companyor Client and supported with original receipts;6.5 ...7, PROVISION
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN
Register : 21-09-2012 — Putus : 05-06-2014 — Upload : 05-08-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 533/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel
Tanggal 5 Juni 2014 —
198 — 124
  • The arbitration proceedings, including themaking of an award, shall take place at the SingaporeInternasional Arbitration Centre and the award of the arbitratorsshall be final and binding upon the parties... ,Terjemahan resmi :Prosedur Penyelesaian Perkara.
    Ayunda Prima Mitra);Bukti TVI42 : Email dari Reynold Ong tanggal 16 November 2007 yangditujukan kepada Sean Dent, perihal: PT DV Audit PTDVDue Dilligence ;57 Bukti TVII43 : Email dari Reynold Ong tanggal 05 Februari 2008 yangditujukan kepada Sean Dent, perihal: Extension of Agreed Upon Procedures ofPT Direct VisionDecember 31, 2007 ;58 Bukti TVII44 : Surat PT. Ayunda Prima Mitra tanggal 12 November 2007perihal Legal & Financial Due Dilligence yang ditujukan kepada PT. DirectVision, Attn.
Restatement Keadaan Memaksa
Author : Rahmat S.S. Soemadipradja;
Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Keadaan Memaksa (Syarat-syarat pembatalan perjanjian yang disebabkan keadaan memaksa/force majeure)
7955 — 27334
  • adanya negosiasi di antara para pihak dalam perjanjian
  • This attribution principle rests upon a number ofconsiderations, which are mentioned in a decision of the Dutch Supreme Court(Hoge Raad der Nederlanden). n the first place, the debtor profits from the useof the other persons. In the second place, the debtor shall be prompted to acareful choice and organisation.The other person will often be a servant or employee. However he can aswell be someone who is not subordinate to the debtor, like a family member,a friend or a subcontractor.
    Upon the demand of one of theparties, the court may modify the effects of a contract or it may set it aside, inwhole or in part, on the bases of unforeseen circumstances of such a naturethat the other party, according to the standards of reasonableness and fairness,may not expect the contract to be maintained in unmodified form (art. 6:258par. 2 DCC).
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 19-02-2019 — Putus : 23-04-2019 — Upload : 17-09-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 97/PDT/2019/PT DKI
Tanggal 23 April 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT INTERNUX
Terbanding/Tergugat : PT HUAWEI TECH INVESTMENT,
206 — 167
  • Dalam Policy No.49/DO/37/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 dibawah bagian tentangconditions telah ditentukanbahwa, alldifferences arising out of thispolicy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointedin writing by the parties in difference or if any cannot agree upon asingle arbitrator. Dengan demikian PengadilanNegeri tidak berwenang untukmemeriksa dan mengadili perkara ini sesuai Pasal 3Halaman 36 dari 87 Hal.
Pengadilan PT JAKARTA Perdata
Register : 30-08-2018 — Putus : 15-11-2018 — Upload : 09-07-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 496/PDT/2018/PT DKI
Tanggal 15 Nopember 2018 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT Alam Dunia Engineering And Construction Diwakili Oleh : Anwar Firmansyah,SH.
Terbanding/Tergugat III : PT Bank Negara Indonesia Persero qq Kantor Cabang Utama Bumi Serpong Damai
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring, TBK
Terbanding/Tergugat IV : PT Bank Negara Indonesia Persero qq Kantor Cabang Utama Menteng
Terbanding/Tergugat II : Hyundai Engineering dan Construction Co.,LTD
146 — 131
  • konpensi maupun dalamRekopensi.Halaman 38 dari 81 halaman putusan perkara Nomor : 496/PDT/2018/PT.DKI89.90.91.92.e Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 794K/Sip/1982tanggal 20 Januari 1983:Memperhatikan Policy No. 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978(surat bukti P.1) di bawah bagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikanbahwea all differences arising out of this Policy shall be referred to thedecision of an arbitrator to be appointed in writing by the parties indifference or if they cannot agree upon
Pengadilan PN PALOPO Perdata Tanah
Register : 23-06-2014 — Putus : 05-05-2014 — Upload : 23-06-2014
Putusan PN PALOPO Nomor 23/PDT.G/2013/PN.PLP
Tanggal 5 Mei 2014 — Penggugat : Drs. Andi Waris, S.Sos, Dkk Tergugat : Agustina Banne, Dkk
113 — 42
  • Nebis in idemdalam hukum perdata merupakan res judicata (thingalready judged upon) nihil inovetur.
Pengadilan PN JAKARTA SELATAN
Register : 15-03-2012 — Putus : 11-07-2013 — Upload : 06-08-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 166/PDT.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 11 Juli 2013 —
212 — 121
  • Terlepas dari alasan kasasi, putusan Pengadilan Tinggi/Pengadilan Negeri harus dibatalkan dengan alasan MahkamahAgung sendiri karena Pengadilan Tinggi salah menerapkanhukum".Dalam Policy No. 49/00137/08 tanggal 10 Agustus 1978 di bawahbagian tentang Conditions telah diuraikan bahwa "all diffrencesarising out of this Policy shall be referred to the decision of anarbitrator to be appointed in writing by the parties in difference or ifthey cannot agree upon a single arbitrator".