Ditemukan 495 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Register : 02-01-2020 — Putus : 13-02-2020 — Upload : 16-11-2020
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 8 P/HUM/2020 Tanggal 13 Februari 2020 — GABUNGAN PERUSAHAAN MAKANAN TERNAK (GPMT) VS PRESIDEN RI;
363 — 180 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
363 — 180 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Putusan Nomor 8 P/HUM/20206.1.3.Demikian pula pandangan yang diungkap C.V Brown dan P.MJackson sebagaimana yang dikutip Haula Rosdiana dan RasinTarigan, Perpajakan: Teori dan Aplikasi, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2005, hal.140, menyatakan:Taxes should be sufficiently simple so that those affected canbe understand them:Peraturan yang sederhana akan lebih pasti, jelas dan mudahdimengerti wajib pajak.
Register : 28-02-2017 — Putus : 12-04-2017 — Upload : 13-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 465 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 12 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
35 — 26 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
35 — 26 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesified;The expressio unius eclusio alterius principle:This principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another;Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociis:Suatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Putus : 17-05-2017 — Upload : 19-09-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 596/B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 17 Mei 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI vs PT. MONAGRO KIMIA
29 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
29 — 17 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespecified;The expressio unius eclusio alterius principle;This principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another,Bahwa pada intinya, lan Mc Leod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociis;Suatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Register : 28-02-2017 — Putus : 20-04-2017 — Upload : 10-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 462 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 20 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
34 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
34 — 22 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesified.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principleThis principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another.Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociisSuatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Register : 28-02-2017 — Putus : 12-04-2017 — Upload : 13-07-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 464 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 12 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
27 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
27 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesified;The expressio unius eclusio alterius principle:This principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another;Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociis:Suatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Putus : 26-03-2013 — Upload : 06-09-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 877 K/Pdt.Sus/2012 Tanggal 26 Maret 2013 — ASTRO NUSANTARA INTERNATIONAL B.V, dkk ; PT. AYUNDA PRIMA MITRA, dkk
1294 — 1069 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
1294 — 1069 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Having regard to the fact that the Claimants have wholly or largely succeeded ateach stage of the reference, the Tribunal conclude that the Respondents should paythe whole of the costs of the arbitration.Legal costs17.Rule 31.1 provides that the tribunal shall have the authority to order in its awardthat all or part of the legal or other costs of a party (apart form the costs of thearbitration) be paid by the other party As before the Tribunal considers that itshould assess those costs now than refer
Putus : 29-03-2016 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 3614 K/PDT/2015 Tanggal 29 Maret 2016 — BUPATI KEPALA DAERAH TINGKAT II KABUPATEN
TANGERANG DKK VS SARMANAH binti H. SAKRIM DKK
53 — 23 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
53 — 23 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Corruptionalso occurs when instead of proceedings being determined on the basis ofevidence and the law, their outcome is affected by improper influences,inducements pressures, threats, or interference, directly or indirectly, fromany quarter or for any reason including those arising from : a conflict ofinterest, nepotism, favouritism to friends, or a particular association orinstitution, consideration of post retirement placements, impropersocialisation with members of the legal profession, the executive
Putus : 23-10-2015 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1241 K/Pdt/2015 Tanggal 23 Oktober 2015 — BUPATI KEPALA DAERAH TINGKAT II TANGERANG
VS
Ahli waris A. ROJANI, Almarhum yaitu:
IS ABDUL ROSYID, DKK
60 — 38 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
60 — 38 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Corruption also occurs wheninstead of proceedings being determined on the basis of evidence and the law,their outcome is affected by improper influences, inducements pressures,threats, or interference, directly or indirectly, from any quarter or for any reasonincluding those ansing from: a conflict of interest, nepotism, favoritism tofriends, or a particular association or institution, consideration of post retirementplacements, improper socialization with members of the legal profession, theexecutive
Register : 21-07-2017 — Putus : 29-08-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1462 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 29 Agustus 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MITSUBA INDONESIA;
40 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
40 — 19 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesified.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principleThis principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another.Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas Noscitur A Sociis;Suatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Register : 28-02-2017 — Putus : 20-04-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 456 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 20 April 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
34 — 33 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
34 — 33 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to berestricted to things of the same class as those which arespesitied.The expressio unius eclusio alterius principleThis principle, which also comes in the form inclusio unius,exclusio alterus, may be translated as the expression (or theinclusion) of one thing implies the exclusion of another.Bahwa pada intinya, lan McLeod mengemukakan tiga asasdalam Contextualism yaitu:(1) Asas noscitur a sociisSuatu hal diketahui dari associatednya.
Register : 28-11-2019 — Putus : 30-06-2021 — Upload : 06-07-2021
Putusan PN DENPASAR Nomor 1200/Pdt.Bth/2019/PN Dps Tanggal 30 Juni 2021 — Penggugat:
Ratna Widia Kurniawati
Tergugat:
1.John Carney
2.Christopher Rhode
3.Doug Ebner
4.PT Bintang Selatan
Turut Tergugat:
1.Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang KPKNL Denpasar
2.Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Badung
3.Mark Damien Clune
4.KANTOR PELAYANAN KEKAYAAN NEGARA DAN LELANG (KPKNL)
5.BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KABUPATEN BADUNG
222 — 149
Ratna Widia Kurniawati
Tergugat:
1.John Carney
2.Christopher Rhode
3.Doug Ebner
4.PT Bintang Selatan
Turut Tergugat:
1.Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang KPKNL Denpasar
2.Kantor Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Badung
3.Mark Damien Clune
4.KANTOR PELAYANAN KEKAYAAN NEGARA DAN LELANG (KPKNL)
5.BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KABUPATEN BADUNG
222 — 149
Cassation Case No.1871 K / PDT / 2016 dated which hasbeen was decided by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia onOctober 17, 2016 at point 4th of the Decision "In the Principal Case of theCase which contains the following: to order Defendant and Defendant IIto pay back the money they had received to the Plaintiffs of US $195,000.00 (one hundred ninety five thousand US Dollars);Coupled with an interest rate of 6% (Six percent) a year starting April 5,2007 until payment to the Plaintiff", then those
Putus : 26-09-2013 — Upload : 20-05-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1343 K/Pdt/2013 Tanggal 26 September 2013 — STANDARD CHARTERED BANK
Melawan
PT NUBIKA JAYA
152 — 110 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
152 — 110 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
It is fordiscussion purposes only and does not constitute any offer,recommendation or solicitation to any person to enter into anytransaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy, nordoes it constitute any prediction of likely future movements in rates orprices or any representation that any such future movements wil notexceed those shown in any illustration. The terms of any transactionentered into will be recorded in a witten confirmation or otherHal 40 dari 60 hal.
Register : 29-07-2020 — Putus : 17-11-2020 — Upload : 01-12-2020
Putusan PN JAKARTA BARAT Nomor 506/Pdt.G/2020/PN Jkt.Brt Tanggal 17 Nopember 2020 — Penggugat:
PT Gerrindo Surya Makmur
Tergugat:
PT Asuransi Central Asia
363 — 132
PT Gerrindo Surya Makmur
Tergugat:
PT Asuransi Central Asia
363 — 132
(E) Dari pertanyaan pertanyaan berikut yang hanya harus dijawab ialah yangbersangkutpaut dengan kecelakaan itu atau mungkin penting untuk bahanpertimbangan lebih lanjut /Of the following questions only those have to beanswered which have something to doAdakah alasan (dan jikalau ada alasan apa) untuk memperkirakan bahwa yangharus dipersalahkan dalam hal ini sebagian atau seluruhnya kecelakaan adalahakibat konstruksi atau tata susunan kapal/ Is there any reason (and if so why) toconsider that the
Register : 03-11-2014 — Putus : 11-02-2015 — Upload : 31-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1015 B/PK/PJK/2014 Tanggal 11 Februari 2015 — PT. AMERO MITRA FILM vs DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI;
96 — 159 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
96 — 159 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Given the unique situation with regard to data or instructions (software)recorded on carrier media for data processing equipment, and thatsome Parties have sought a different approach, it would also beconsistent with the Agreement for those Parties which wish to do so toadopt the following practice:In determining the Customs value of imported carrier media bearing dataor instructions, only the cost or value of the carrier medium itself shall betaken into account.
Putus : 09-11-2017 — Upload : 18-12-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 2033 K/PID.SUS/2017 Tanggal 9 Nopember 2017 — Suharto,A.Md.RO A.Md Kep.S.KM
153 — 95 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
153 — 95 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Artinya, Terdakwa bekerja mempunyai AtasanLangsung dan berada dibawah pengawasan Kepala institusinya.Dalam pengaturan tata kerjanya, Perawat bekerja di bawah payunghukum UndangUndang Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 Tentang Keperawatan (/exspecialis).Dalam praktik keperawatan, fungsi Perawat diantaranya yakni,pertama, fungsi independent, adalah those activities that are considered tobe within nursings scope of diagnoses and treatment.
Register : 29-06-2021 — Putus : 23-08-2021 — Upload : 30-11-2021
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 305/PDT/2021/PT DKI Tanggal 23 Agustus 2021 — Pembanding/Penggugat : PT. GENESA DIRGANTARA, Diwakili Oleh : PT. GENESA DIRGANTARA,
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. ASURANSI WAHANA TATA
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WILLIS INDONESIA
177 — 124
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. ASURANSI WAHANA TATA
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. WILLIS INDONESIA
177 — 124
Hanafie tidak termasuk dalam definisiInstruktur Sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Bagian 4 Bagan Polis.Penggunaan Illegal:Whilst the Aircraft is being used for any illegal purpose or for anypurpose other than those stated in Part 3 of the Schedule and asdefined in the Definitions.Dalam terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia:Pada saat Pesawat sedang digunakan untuk tujuan illegal atau tujuanselain dari yang tercantum dalam Bagian 3 Bagan Polis dansebagaimana didefinisikan dalam Definisi.Hal. 17 dari hal 61 Putusan
Register : 21-03-2017 — Putus : 14-06-2017 — Upload : 01-11-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 589 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 14 Juni 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT. MONARGO KIMIA;
33 — 13 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
33 — 13 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The general words are to be restricted to things of thesame class as those which are spesified.Halaman 28 dari 71 halaman.
Upload : 28-10-2016
Putusan PT BANTEN Nomor 114/PDT/2016/PT BTN PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, berkedudukan di Korea Center Lt. 4 Suite 405, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto Kav. 58, Jakarta Selatan, dalm hal ini diwakili oleh kuasanya M. LUTHFIE HAKIM, S.H., M.H., RUSDIANTO, MATULATUWA, S.H., ANITA ZIZLAVSKY, S.H., FERDINAND ROBOT, S.H., M.H., WAHYU BUDI WIBOWO, S.H., JUNIARTI, S.H., dan FANI KUMALA SARI, S.H., Para Advokat dan Konsultan Hukum pada M. LUTHFIE HAKIM & PARTNERS Law Firm, beralamat di Graha Pratama Lt. 20, Jl. MT. Haryono Kav. 15, Jakarta 12810, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tertanggal 14 April 2016, selanjutnya disebut sebagai PEMBANDING semula TERGUGAT I;
MELAWAN
1. PT. IGAS UTAMA, berkedudukan di Plaza 3 Pondok Indah Blok E No. 9, Jl. TB. Simatupang, Jakarta Selatan, dalam hal ini diwakili oleh kuasanya H. ARI WAHYUDI HERTANTO, S.H., M.H., SUGIH HARTONO, S.H., M.H., DANANG WS MARTOSRIWARDOYO, S.H., dan H. HUDI MASHUDI, S.H., Para Advokat dan Konsultan Hukum dari Kantor Hukum WAHYUDI, HARTONO & PARTNER, beralamat di Talavera Office Suite 18th Floor, Jl. TB. Simatupang Kav. 22-26 Jakarta, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus tertanggal 1 Juni 2015, selanjutnya disebut sebagai TERBANDING I semula PENGGUGAT;
2. PT. BANTEN INTI GASINDO, berkedudukan di Kompleks Arga Baja Pura B D-9/17-A Gerogol, Pulo Merak, Cilegon-Banten, yang selanjutnya disebut sebagai TERBANDING II semula TERGUGAT
136 — 96
136 — 96
Statements of case which are suitable fro striking outon ground (a) include those which raise an unwinnable case wherecontinuance of the proceedings is without any possible benefit to therespondent and would waste resources on both sides (Harris v. BoltBurden 2000 L.T.L., February 2, 2000,CA). A claim or defence may bestruct out as not being a valid claim or defence as a matter of law (PriceMeats Ltd. v.
Putus : 08-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1827 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 8 Nopember 2017 — BUT. CNOOC SES, LTD VS DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK,
222 — 91 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
222 — 91 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Contracting State, having apermanent establishment in the other Contracting State, derivesprofits through that permanent establishment, such profits may betaxed (in addition to the tax which would be chargeable on thoseprofits if they were the profits of a company which was a resident ofthat other Contracting State) in accordance with the laws of the otherContracting State but the rate of tax so imposed shall not exceed10% of the profits of the permanent establishment after payment ofthe income tax on those
Putus : 25-01-2017 — Upload : 04-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 62 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2017 Tanggal 25 Januari 2017 — PT REPUBLIK ENERGI & METAL VS ZAINAL ABIDINSYAH SIREGAR
710 — 503 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
710 — 503 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The Borrower agreesfor the benefit of the Lender that the English courts will have nonexclusiveJurisdiction to settle any dispute including a dispute relating to noncontractual obligations arising out of or in connection with this Agreementand for these purposes submits to the jurisdiction of those courts";Terjemahan resmi:"Perjanjian ini dan setiap kewajibankewajiban nonkontraktual yangtimbul dari atau sehubungan dengan Perjanjian ini akan diaturberdasarkan hukum Inggris.