Ditemukan 2114 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Register : 21-06-2021 — Putus : 05-07-2021 — Upload : 10-08-2021
Putusan PN TANJUNG SELOR Nomor 2/Pid.Pra/2021/PN Tjs
Tanggal 5 Juli 2021 — Pemohon:
NURDIANA, S.PI
Termohon:
Kepala Kejaksaan RI Cq. Kepala Kejaksaan Tinggi Kaltim Cq. Kepala Kejaksaan Negeri Bulungan
9245
  • Due process of law pada dasarnya bukansematasemata mengenai rule of law, akan tetapi merupakan unsur yangessensial dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan yang intinya adalah bahwa iamerupakan ...a law which hears before it condemns , which procceds uponinguiry, and renders judgement only after trial...;Bahwa pada dasarnya yang menjadi titik sentral adalah perlindungan hakasasi individu terhadap arbitrary action of the goverment.
Author : Ahmad Fikri Assegaf (Penulis); Imam Nasima (Editor); Miko S Ginting (Peneliti); Eryanto Nugroho; M Nur Sholikin; Betari Octavia (Asisten Peneliti); Mir'atul Latifah (Asisten Peneliti); Normand Edwin (Asisten Peneliti); Putri Bilqish (Asisten Peneliti); Ryand Armilis (Asisten Peneliti);
Penjelasan Hukum (Restatement) tentang Klausula Baku
66353372
  • Klausula bakumarak digunakan dalam perjanjian, khususnya perjanjian yang dekat dengankehidupan sehari-hari. Dapat dikatakan bahwa klausula baku lahir sebagai akibatdari munculnya pemasaran masal atas produk maupun jasa. Dalam pandanganprodusen, ... [Selengkapnya]
  • Echols dan Hassan Shadily, Kamus InggrisIndonesia:An Englishindonesian Dictionary, Op.cit, hal 223.tertulis yang memuat klausulaklausula yang telahditetapkan sebelumnya, digunakan berulangkalidalam suatu kegiatan usaha atau dalam kegiatanindustri tertentu dengan sedikit penambahan atauperubahan yang disesuaikan dengan situasitertentu. 31 Sementara itu, klausula eksemsi atau exemptionclause didefinisikan sebagai a contractual provisionproviding that a party will not be liable for damagesfor which
    Metode pengurangan atau bahkanpenghapusan kewajibankewajiban 2632 Kalimat asli dari paragraf diatas adalah an exemption clausemay take many forms, but all such clauses have one thing incommon in that they exempt a party from a liability which hewould have borne had it not been for the clause.
    Most person have difficult remaining the lasttime they contracted other than standard form".Demikian pula sebagaimana ditegaskan oleh W.Friedmann bahwa "most contract which govern ourdaily lives are standard contracts".5Latar belakang yang mendasari lahirnya klausulabaku adalah efisiensi dan efektifitas dalamberkontrak.>8 Soedjono Dirdjosisworo>?
Putus : 30-10-2017 — Upload : 13-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1656/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 30 Oktober 2017 —
128 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Putusan Nomor 1656/B/PK/PJK/2017bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah: "Inbrief, this method applies the tool of economic analysis to law with afocus on the free market's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utilitymaximization (it is being said that the law simply reflects theeconomic system within which it is situated" (Morris and Murphy);bahwa menurut metode tersebut pembuatan suatu aturan(perundangundangan) bertujuan untuk mencapai efisiensi danmaksimisasi kekayaan serta manfaat
Putus : 12-10-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1676/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 12 Oktober 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. AMP PLANTATION
218 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • pengamananpenerimaan negara agar pembangunan nasional dapat dilaksanakansecara mandir;bahwa dalam teori hukum khususnya terkait dengan pembuatanperaturan perundangundangan dikenal metode "Law andEconomis/Economis Analysis of Law";bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah: "Inbrief, this method applies the tool of economic analysis to law with afocus on the free market's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utilitymaximization (it is being said that the law simply reflects the economicsystem within which
Register : 28-09-2015 — Putus : 21-10-2015 — Upload : 26-10-2015
Putusan PN KEFAMENANU Nomor 4/Pid.Prap/2015/PN Kfm.
Tanggal 21 Oktober 2015 — - Drs. VINSENSIUS SABA sebagai PEMOHON - KEJAKSAAN AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA C.Q. KEJAKSAAN TINGGI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR C.Q. KEPALA KEJAKSAAN NEGERI KEFAMENANU, BERALAMAT DI KEFAMENANU sebagai TERMOHON
17692
  • Cardozo sebagai hakim terkenal di Amerika,Halaman 41 dari 73 Putusan Nomor 4/Pid.Prap/2015/PN Kfmmenyatakan 7he law which /s the resulting product is not found but made. The process in itshighest reaches is not discovery, but creation ".
Putus : 05-04-2013 — Upload : 23-01-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 293 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 5 April 2013 — BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI) vs PT. SMG CONSULTANS, yang diwakili oleh Direktur PT. SMG CONSULTANS Kieth Whitchruch
816740 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Pdt.Sus/201232Putusan Arbitrase Asing ("Konvensi New York") (bukti P29) mengatur sebagaiberikut:"Article V1 Recognition and enforcement of the award may be refused, at the request of theparry against whom it is invoked, onlY if that parry furnishes to the competent authorirywhere the recognition and enforcement is sought, proof that;a The parties to the agreement referred to in article II were, under the lawapplicable to them, under some incapacity, or the said agreement is not valid under thelaw to which
Register : 17-05-2013 — Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 27-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 312/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Lawan 1. PT. BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2. H. ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA, 3. YUDHA TRISNO, 4. SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA, 5. MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN, 6. PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN, 8. ANKIT PATNI, Penggugat: PT PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Tergugat: 1.PT BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2.H ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA 3.YUDHA TRISNO 4.SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA 5.MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN 6.PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN 7.SUWARNO 8.ANKIT PATNI 9.SKP OVERSEAS PTE,LTD 10.HADI JUANA 11.OLFITRIAN 12.PT CAKRA KARYA BERSAMA 13.PT SOLUSINDO NUSANTARA 14.TRADE CONSORTIUM PTE LTD 15.NOTARIS SITI SAFARIJAH 16.NOTARIS SHELLA FALIANTI,SH 17.KEPALA BADAN KOORDINASI PENANAMAN MODAL REPUBLIK IDONESIA 18.MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAM REPUBLIK INDONESIA
5932564
  • (b)Faith.In the Event that such dispute or a difference cannot be sosettled within 90 (ninety) days from the time such dispute ordifference first arises between the Parties, such disputes ordifference shall be referred to an arbitration held inaccordance with the arbitration rules of SingaporeInternational Arbitration Centre (SIAC) which rules aredeemed to be incorporated by reference into this Clause.Terjemahannya :(a)Setiap perselisinan atau perbedaan yang timbul antara ParaPihak sehubungan dengan
    Putusan No.312/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.difference shall be referred to an arbitration held inaccordance with the arbitration rules of SingaporeInternational Arbitration Centre (SIAC) which rules aredeemed to be incorporated by reference into this Clause.(c) Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, thearbitration tribunal shall consist of a single arbitrator.
    (d) The arbitration shall be conducted by a sole arbitrator tobeappointed by the mutual agreement of the Sellers and thePurchasers and in case of those parties fail to appoint thearbitrator within sixty (60) days then the arbitrator shall beappointed by the Chairmain of SIAC which shall appoint anindependent arbitrator who shall not have any financialinterest in the dispute, controversy or claim.
    The New York Convention on the Recognition ofEnforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards yang telahdiratifikasi berdasarkan Keputusan Presiden No. 34 Tahun1981 (Lembaran Negara No. 40 Tahun 1981)Pasal Il(1) Each Contracting State shall recognize an agreement inwriting under which the parties undertake to submit toarbitration all or any differences which have arisen or whichmay arise between them in respect of a defined legalrelationship, whether contractual or not, concerning asubject matter capable of
Register : 03-08-2020 — Putus : 19-08-2020 — Upload : 16-09-2020
Putusan PN TANJUNG KARANG Nomor 6/Pid.Pra/2020/PN Tjk
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2020 — Pemohon:
NURHADI
Termohon:
Kepolisian Daerah Propinsi Lampung, Cq. Kapolda Lampung,
13639
  • Adapun tujuan yang ingin dicapai dari pengawasan horizontal dari lembagaPraperadilan tersebut adalah sesuai dengan tujuan umum dibentuknya KUHAP,yaitu untuk menciptakan suatu proses penegakan hukum yang didasarkan padakerangka due proces of law.Due proces of law pada dasarnya bukan sematamata mengenai rule of law, akantetapi merupakan unsur yang essensial dalam penyelenggaraan peradilan yangintinya adalah bahwa ia merupakan ...a law which bears before it condemns, whichproceeds upon inquiry, and
Register : 18-03-2011 — Putus : 12-04-2012 — Upload : 21-06-2015
Putusan PN SEKAYU Nomor 204/PID.B/2011/PN.SKY
Tanggal 12 April 2012 — MULUD Bin KARSIDI
5117
  • Penalaran hukum (legal reasoning) menurut Neil MacCormic adalahone branch of practical reasoning, which is the application by humans of their reason todeciding how it is right toconduct themselves in situations of choice yang menurutbatasan ini bahwa hukum adalah alat berpikir praktis (untuk mengubah keadaan),bukan sekedar berpikir teoretis (untuk menambah pengetahuan);Menimbang, bahwa Penasihat Hukum terdakwa menyatakan dalam notapembelaannya bahwa terdakwa MULUD Bin KARSIDI tidak mengetahui tujuanmasyarakat
Putus : 04-12-2017 — Upload : 24-04-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1300 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2017
Tanggal 4 Desember 2017 — EIK ENGINEERING SDN. BHD VS PT ENGINEERING INDONESIA KARYA
477294 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Nomor 1300 K/Pat.SusHKI/2017IRE JebStreet conn ; o Search i Einpinyer=PT Engineering Indonesia KaryaOD @ Gy = Cempany OverviewPUP rgietaeiesg (rinictinenrn Sebagaimana dapat dicermati dari lowongan kerja di atas, Tergugat secaraterangterangan mengaku sebagai distributor resmi Penggugat di Indonesia.Berikut adalah kutipan informasi yang relevan dengan perkara a quo;PT Engineering Indonesia Karya, the premium supplier which focusingon marketing the heavy construction equipment, especially theattachment
Putus : 19-09-2016 — Upload : 15-12-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 811/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 19 September 2016 — PT. Pertamina (Persero) vs. Direktur Jenderal Pajak
4018 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contractors shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10payalde to the Laiqeefaction Company pursigut te Seeclinn G1, nelBholl advise the Trustee of such procedures whieh sholl inelude o requircenenl that the Liquefaction Compouny farnish the Tresor wilh weacknowledstient that each poyevnt by the Tras lereumber fullysatistics tee linkililies of erlamina or the Contractors, as the case may be, will respect to thq.invoies to which
Putus : 29-04-2009 — Upload : 03-11-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 731K/PIDSUS/2009
Tanggal 29 April 2009 — JAT LIE CHANDRA alias CECE
8949 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • For, if the state were to resort to killing in orderto enforce its will, it would legitimize the very behavior which the law sought torepress, namely the use of deadly force to settle disputes " ;Secara keilmuan, argumen Cesare Beccaria tersebut sangat menarik dan dapatdibenarkan sebagai dasar pijakan kerangka konseptual untuk menganalisislebin lanjut mengenai utilitas dan implementasi pidana mati.
Putus : 02-10-2013 — Upload : 17-12-2013
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 862 K/Pdt/2013
Tanggal 2 Oktober 2013 — Ny. SITI HARDIYANTI RUKMANA, Dkk vs PT BERKAH KARYA BERSAMA, Dkk
33582713 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • No. 862 K/Pdt/2013Investment Agreement tertanggal 23 Agustus 2002 danSupplemental Agreement tertanggal 7 Februari 2003, sebagaimanadikutip sebagai berikut:In the framework of the implementation of the InvestmentAgreement dated 23 August 2002 as further supplemented bythe supplemental agreement dated 7 February 2003 executed bythe parties thereto, including the Principal and the Attorney......t0 call and/or attend any EGM of CTPI which will discuss, interalia, the following matters:5.
    PT TPI (TurutTergugat ) yang membahas masalah/agenda apapun dalam rangkapelaksanaan Investment Agreement tertanggal 23 Agustus 2002dan Supplemental Agreement tertanggal 7 Februari 2003,sebagaimana dikutip sebagai berikut:In the framework of the implementation of the InvestmentAgreement dated 23 August 2002 as further supplemented bythe Supplemental Agreement dated 7 February 2003 executed bythe parties thereto, including the Principal and the Attorney......to call and/or attend any EGM of CTPI which
Putus : 21-02-2017 — Upload : 02-05-2017
Putusan PN JEPARA Nomor 45/Pdt.G/2016/PN Jpa
Tanggal 21 Februari 2017 —
9758
  • dalam proses transaksi eksporimpor bank tidak berusandengan barang, bank hanya berurusan dengan dokumen sehinggaapabila ternyata barang yang dikirim oleh eksportir rusak bukantanggung jawab bank hal ini sebagaimana diatur dalam Article /Pasal5 UCPDC 600 yang menyatakan sebagai berikut :Bankbank berurusan dengan dokumendokumen dan tidak denganbarang, jasa atau pelaksanaan terhadap mana dokumendokumentersebut mungkin berkaitanBank deals with documents and not with goods, services orperformences to which
Putus : 30-10-2017 — Upload : 13-03-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1658/B/PK/PJK/2017
Tanggal 30 Oktober 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK vs PT. AMP PLANTATION
3411 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • penerimaan negara agar pembangunan nasional dapatdilaksanakan secara mandir;bahwa dalam teori hukum khususnya terkait dengan pembuatanperaturan perundangundangan dikenal metode "Law andEconomis/Economis Analysis of Law;bahwa "Law and Economis/Economis Analysis of Law" adalah: "Inbrief, this method applies the tool of economic analysis to law with afocus on the free market's aim of efficiency and wealth/or utilitymaximization (it is being said that the law simply reflects theeconomic system within which
Register : 10-11-2020 — Putus : 14-07-2021 — Upload : 12-08-2021
Putusan PN MEDAN Nomor 756/Pdt.G/2020/PN Mdn
Tanggal 14 Juli 2021 — Penggugat:
1.Prof. Usman Pelly MA
2.Meuthia F Fachruddinm. Eng. Sc. IR
3.Miduk Hutabarat
4.Rizanul
5.Ir. Burhan Batubara
6.Dadang Darmawan, M.Si
Tergugat:
Walikota Medan
512215
  • Defined as an invasion ofa legally protected interest, which is (a) concrete and particularized:and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical. The injurymust also be fairly tracable to the defendants challenged action andnot the result of the independent action of some third party not beforethe court, and be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that theinjury will be redressed by a favorable decision.
Register : 25-01-2017 — Putus : 18-04-2017 — Upload : 12-05-2017
Putusan PT PEKANBARU Nomor 19/PDT/2017/PT.PBR
Tanggal 18 April 2017 — Dasrul Dahlan, Dkk Sebagai PENGGUGAT Lawan PT. CHEVRON PACIFIC INDONESIA, Dkk Sebagai TERGUGAT
140513
  • ChevronPacific Indonesia, yaitu: Our companys foundation is built onour Values, which distinguish us and guide our action. Weconduct our business in socially responsible and ethicalmanner. We respect the law, support universal human rights,protect the environment and benefit the communities where wework.Bahwa sejak tanggal 4 Juni 2010, Serikat Pekerja Nasional Chevron(SPNC) sudah menyampaikan surat kepada bapak Syamsul Bakhri(Manager HRIR PT.
Putus : 24-10-2018 — Upload : 03-12-2018
Putusan PT PONTIANAK Nomor 58/PDT/2018/PT PTK
Tanggal 24 Oktober 2018 —
145192
  • Hindoli facilities are well managed andmaintained to a good standard.We have requested copies of the Standard Operation Procedure(SOP) for the loading of CPO onto barges together with the pipingdiagram but up to issue of this report, these documents have notbeen provided.As mentioned above, the foreign material found included mineralwater cup 220ml with brand ALPINE which is produced inSurabaya, East Java.
Register : 14-02-2019 — Putus : 03-07-2019 — Upload : 17-07-2019
Putusan PN PADANG Nomor 26/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pdg
Tanggal 3 Juli 2019 — Penggugat:
H. SYAHRUDDIN UJANG
Tergugat:
1.Kampus Politeknik Negeri Padang
2.PT.Bank Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat
3.PT. Kawan Lama Cabang Padang, Kota Padang Sumatera Barat
7829
  • S 073131338fH) PNPdo2019 Pid.s... a NPWP : 02.550.026.7201.000Version created last ... qj , ;15156 Tuesday, 9 3... i Harga Penawaran : Rp. 1.015.071.000, (satu milyar limao Terkoreksi belas juta tujuh puluh satu ribu rupiah)Gil PNPdg2019 Pid.5... fVersion created last...15:56 Tuesday, 9 Ju... a Jangka Waktu : 90(sembilanpuluh) hari kalendera Pelaksanaan i 2, PEMENANG CADANGANI@ Which fle do I want to save?
Putus : 22-11-2016 — Upload : 13-02-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 809/B/PK/PJK/2016
Tanggal 22 Nopember 2016 — PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) vs. DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK
3219 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • upon receiptof notice from both Pertamina and the Contractors that any suchinvoice haa been approved for payment, pay to the Liquefaction Compooy from the Todok Payment Account the amount of such invoice,porsuant to procedures to be agreed upon pursuant to Section 6.2,62 Pertamina and the Contrasters shall agree with the Liquefaction Company on appropriate procedures for the payment of funds10ayaide to the Taquefaction Company puesaiut toe Sieeclina Gl, amlol advise the Trustee of such procedures which