Ditemukan 495 data

Urut Berdasarkan
 
Putus : 10-04-2017 — Upload : 09-10-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 31 K/Pdt/2017
Tanggal 10 April 2017 — NURHIDAYAH, DKK VS PT AETRA AIR JAKARTA, DKK
1219906 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Ke depan tantangan bagi perbaikan semakin besar antara lainkarena permasalahan kekurangan pasokan air baku yang semakinmendesak (Jensen 2005);This shows clearly that Jakartas domestic water tariff is lower than those of other major Asian citiessuch as Singapore, HongKong, West Manila, Beijing and Macao: Singapore'09Hongkeng'09West Manila09Bejing'09Macao'08West Jakarta'09He Chi Minh'08Bangkok'09Phnom Penh'08East Manila10Colombo'I9Delhr09Kuala Lumpur'09 Surabaya'08Averaged water tariffs US$/m3 Halaman
Putus : 26-02-2008 — Upload : 19-08-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1713K/PDT/2007
Tanggal 26 Februari 2008 — PT BANK MIZUHO INDONESIA ; MORGAN STANLEY & Co. INCORPORATED, dkk. ; INDAH KIAT INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY BV ; BANK AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, dkk.
288250 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • konsultanhukum Penggugat dan Tergugat 13 di Indonesia, tepatnya padahalaman 7 paragraf 15, dinyatakan bahwa:The choice of New York Law as the governing law of theUnderwriting Agreement, each of the Indentures (including, withoutlimitation, each Guarantee contained therein) and the Notes is a validchoise of law and, subject to considerations of Indonesian publicpolicy, will be recognized and given effect by the courts of theRepublic of Indonesia provided that, based on the statements ofexpert witnesses, those
    The choice of New York Law as the governing law of theUnderwriting Agreement, each of the Indentures (including, withoutlimitation, each Guarantee contained therein) and the Notes is a validchoice of law and, subject to consideration of Indonesian publicpolicy, will be recognized and given effect by the courts of theRepublic of Indonesia provided that, based on the statements ofexpert witnesses, those courts will be in a position to determine theapplicable rules of New York law.
Author : Ade Maman Suherman; J. Satrio;
Batasan Umum (Kecakapan dan Kewenangan Bertindak berdasarkan Batasan Umur)
581131538
  • 1. Perlu sekali adanya keseragaman istilah dan pengertian : kewenangan hukum, kecakapan bertindak, dan kewenangan bertindak.2. Dalam hubungannya dengan kecakapan bertindak, yang dikaitkan dengan umur dewasa, kita telah mempunyai patokan usia dewasa ... [Selengkapnya]
  • The law concerning those transactions is integrated in the general civil code; thus the rules on capacity are to be applied on contracts concerned.The approval implies a legal act by the legal representatives.
Putus : 30-07-2012 — Upload : 19-12-2019
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 305 K/Pdt.Sus/2012
Tanggal 30 Juli 2012 — PT PERTAMINA (Pesero), yang diwakili oleh Direktur Utama, Karen Agustiawati, dkk vs KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU)
6341264 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • Put.No. 305 K/Pdt.Sus/2012"We do not believe that the knowledge of the workcarried out by LNGI could in any way have giveneither Mitsui or Mitsubishi any advantage in thepartner selection process that would have resultedin either of those companies being shortlisted orbeing finally selected. What information there wasrelated largely to technology or was specific to thesmall scheme based on Senoro alone. None of thiswas relevant to the larger scheme for the combinedMatindok and Senoro blocks.
    Contracts totalling 24 mtpa (~50%) of Japanesedemand with 3 regional suppliers were due to expire in20092011 and by 2006 negotiations were underway toexplore the opportunities to extend those contracts...there were concerns about the availability of gas supplyto extend both the Bontang and Kenai volumes. Thisserved to put a new demand strain on the marketparticularly now coming from Japan the key globalLNG buyer."
Register : 17-10-2018 — Putus : 11-12-2018 — Upload : 31-01-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 644/PDT/2018/PT.DKI
Tanggal 11 Desember 2018 — PT.GUNUNG MADU PLANTATION >< MUHAMMAD JINNY GOHMASHUN CS
228135
  • Penggugatkepada pihakpihak yang tidak dikenal oleh Penggugatmaupun berhubungan dengan Penggugat maupun kegiatanusaha Penguggat yang diduga dikenal Tergugat dengantotal mencapai Rp. 26.825.000.000 (dua puluh enam miliardelapan ratus dua puluh lima juta rupiah) dalam kurun waktudari Mei 2009 sampai September 2015.Gugatan Singapura Angka 17 keterangan (13):In or around the period from May 2009 to September 2015,a total of approximately IDR 26.825 billion was paid fromthe Plaintiff to the persons otherthat those
Putus : 05-05-2010 — Upload : 14-02-2022
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 128 PK/PDT.SUS/2009
Tanggal 5 Mei 2010 — PT TELEKOMUNIKASI SELULAR, dkk terhadap KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA REPUBLIK INDONESIA dkk
991699 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • (tentang Ruang Lingkup Penerapan) Bagian C disebutkanbahwa: ...does not apply to sovereign acts of the Stateitself, or to those of local governments, or to acts ofenterprises or natural persons which are compelled orsupervised by the State or by local governments or branchesof government acting within their delegated power.Selanjutnya, dalam Putusannya butir 5.5.2.13, halaman 638, Termohonkemudian menyimpulkan:Berdasarkan pertimbangan seperti ini, Majelis Komisiberpendapat bahwa Pemerintah Republik
    Sertifikat tersebut dikutip sebagaiberikut: have read all of the agenda and minutes of meetings of the board ofdirectors and those of annual general meetings of shareholders held inthe period from 1 August 2004 to 31 August 2007 (the Agenda andMinutes).The Agenda and Minutes, which have read, do not contain anydiscussion on the performance, management or operations of Indosatand Telkomsel.Terjemahan ResmiSaya sudah membaca seluruh agenda dan berita acara rapat dewandireksi dan rapat umum pemegang
    Dalam Bab II Bagian Il (tentang RuangLingkup Penerapan) Bagian C disebutkan bahwa:does not apply to sovereign acts of the State itself, or to those oflocal governments, or to acts of enterprises or natural personswhich are compelled or supervised by the State or by localgovernments or branches of goverment acting within their delegatedpower.Berdasarkan pertimbangan seperti ini, Majelis Komisi berpendapatbahwa Pemerintah Republik Indonesia bukanlah pelaku usahasSebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 1 angka
    Compared to other providers which did notexperience significant structural changes like Indosat, theperformance of those providers during the period of Indosatstransition could be better compared to Indosat.Since the second half of 2006, Indosat started to regain itsmomentum in terms of subscribers gained and revenues generated.The improvement in performance was also reflected in the recenttrend of Indosats share price which was Rp 7,650 in July 2007 orthe highest since IPO.Terjemahan bebasnya adalah
Register : 17-05-2013 — Putus : 20-08-2015 — Upload : 27-12-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 312/Pdt.G/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.
Tanggal 20 Agustus 2015 — PT. PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Lawan 1. PT. BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2. H. ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA, 3. YUDHA TRISNO, 4. SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA, 5. MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN, 6. PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN, 8. ANKIT PATNI, Penggugat: PT PACIFIC SAMUDRA PERKASA Tergugat: 1.PT BARA PRIMA MANDIRI 2.H ANDI ANZHAR CAKRA WIJAYA 3.YUDHA TRISNO 4.SAURABH JHUNJHUNWALA 5.MARGARETHA MONALISA WULAN 6.PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN 7.SUWARNO 8.ANKIT PATNI 9.SKP OVERSEAS PTE,LTD 10.HADI JUANA 11.OLFITRIAN 12.PT CAKRA KARYA BERSAMA 13.PT SOLUSINDO NUSANTARA 14.TRADE CONSORTIUM PTE LTD 15.NOTARIS SITI SAFARIJAH 16.NOTARIS SHELLA FALIANTI,SH 17.KEPALA BADAN KOORDINASI PENANAMAN MODAL REPUBLIK IDONESIA 18.MENTERI HUKUM DAN HAM REPUBLIK INDONESIA
5792500
  • (d) The arbitration shall be conducted by a sole arbitrator tobeappointed by the mutual agreement of the Sellers and thePurchasers and in case of those parties fail to appoint thearbitrator within sixty (60) days then the arbitrator shall beappointed by the Chairmain of SIAC which shall appoint anindependent arbitrator who shall not have any financialinterest in the dispute, controversy or claim.
Putus : 07-01-2015 — Upload : 10-03-2016
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 338 PK/Pdt/2014
Tanggal 7 Januari 2015 — MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATE VS APP INTERNASIONAL FINANCE COMPANY B.V, DKK
513376 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • konsultanhukum Penggugat dan Tergugat XIII di Indonesia, tepatnya padahalaman 7 paragraf 15, dinyatakan bahwa:"The choice of New York Law as the governing law of theUnderwriting Agreement, each of the Indentures (including, withoutlimitation, each Guarantee contained therein) and the Notes is avalid choice of law and, subject to considerations of Indonesianpublic policy, will be recognized and given effect by the courts of theRepublic of Indonesia provided that, based on the statements ofexpert witnesses, those
Register : 24-02-2021 — Putus : 11-05-2021 — Upload : 20-05-2021
Putusan PN KASONGAN Nomor 11/Pid.Sus-LH/2021/PN Ksn
Tanggal 11 Mei 2021 — RIPANSYAH ALIAS ISAH BIN RAMLI
367707
  • Keenam, teoridelegasi, di mana alasan untuk dapat membebankan pertanggungjawabanpidana kepada korporasi adalah apabila ada pendelegasian ataupelimpahan wewenang dari direksi korporasi kepada pegawai korporasiuntuk melakukan sesuatu untuk dan atas nama korporasi, dan tentunyadengan tidak melampaui kuasa yang diberikan dalam delegasi tersebut.Ajaran ini berdekatan dengan salah satu asas actus servi, in lis quibusopera ejus communiter adhibita est, actus domini habetur (The act of aservant in those
Register : 24-02-2021 — Putus : 11-05-2021 — Upload : 20-05-2021
Putusan PN KASONGAN Nomor 12/Pid.Sus-LH/2021/PN Ksn
Tanggal 11 Mei 2021 — UD. KARYA ABADI Yang diwakili oleh RIPANSYAH Alias ISAH Bin RAMLI
636413
  • Ajaran ini berdekatan dengan salah satuasas actus servi, in iis quibus opera ejus communiter adhibita est, actus dominihabetur (The act of a servant in those things in which he is usually employed isconsidered the act of his master. Jika diterjemahkan secara bebas: perbuatanseorang pegawai atau perbuatan pegawai dalam halhal di mana ia biasanyadipekerjakan atau ditugaskan, akan dianggap sebagai tindakan darituan/majikan/atasannya).
Putus : 19-08-2008 — Upload : 21-01-2009
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 445PK/PDT/2007
Tanggal 19 Agustus 2008 — BANK AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY ; MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED, dkk. ; PT. INDAH KIAT PULP & PAPER Tbk ; THE DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, dkk.
475980 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • (xv) the choice of New York law as the governing lawof this Agreement, each Indenture (including, withoutlimitation, each Guarantee contained therein) and theNotes is a valid choice of law and, subject toconsiderations of Indonesian public policy, will berecognized and given effect by the courts of theRepublic of Indonesia provided that, based on thestatements of expert witnesses, those courts will bein a position to determine the applicable rules of NewYork law;such counsel does not believe that
Putus : 20-04-2011 — Upload : 17-10-2011
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1538 K/PDT/2009
Tanggal 20 April 2011 — BANK AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, DK VS APP INTERNASIONAL FINANCE COMPANY BV, DKK
335270 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • hukumPenggugat dan Tergugat 13 di Indonesia, tepatnya pada halaman 7paragraf 15, dinyatakan bahwa :The choice of New York Law as the governing law of theUnderwriting Agreement, each of the Indentures (including, withoutlimitation, each Guarantee contained therein) and the Notes is a validchoice of law and, subject to considerations of Indonesian publicpolicy, will be recognized and given effect by the courts of theRepublic of Indonesia provided that, based on the statements ofexpert witnesses, those
Putus : 07-11-2012 — Upload : 18-07-2013
Putusan PN SURABAYA Nomor 157/PID.SUS/2011/PN.SBY
Tanggal 7 Nopember 2012 —
8739
  • Those Bahasa Inggris Indonesia/Indonesia 1 4 4 0 4 03. Ensiklopedi Kewarganegaraan 1 8 8 0 8 04. Ensiklopedi Bahasa Indonesia 1 8 8 0 8 05. Ensiklopedi Matematika 1 8 8 0 8 06. Ensiklopedi Fisika 2 4 8 0 4 07. Ensiklopedi Kimia 2 4 8 0 4 08. Ensiklopedi Biologi 1 4 4 0 4 09. Ensiklopedi Geografi/Atlas 1 4 4 0 4 010. Ensiklopedi Sejarah 2 4 8 0 4 011. Ensiklopedi Sosiologi 2 4 8 0 4 012. Ensiklopedi Seni Budaya 1 4 4 0 4 013. Teen = Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga dan 2 5 10 0 5 014.
Register : 09-08-2016 — Putus : 06-02-2018 — Upload : 21-03-2018
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 533/Pdt.G/2016/PN JKT.SEL
Tanggal 6 Februari 2018 — Penggugat:
PT Gunung Madu Plantations
Tergugat:
1.Muhammad Jimmy Goh Mashun
2.PT Visi Bangun Cipta Mandiri
3.Hirawan Gelar
4.Anna Rina Mediana
5.PT Asconusa Air Transport
6.PT Bee Air Charter
7.Doddy Gautama
280159
  • dengan Penggugat maupun kegiatanusaha Penguggat yang diduga dikenal Tergugat dengantotal mencapai Rp. 26.825.000.000 (dua puluh enam miliardelapan ratus dua puluh lima juta rupiah) dalam kurun waktudari Mei 2009 sampai September 2015.Gugatan Singapura Angka 17 keterangan (13):Halaman 37 dari 433 Putusan Perdata Gugatan Nomor 533/Padt.G/2016/PN JKT.SELIn or around the period from May 2009 to September 2015, atotal of approximately IDR 26.825 billion was paid from thePlaintiff to the persons otherthat those
Putus : 25-11-2011 — Upload : 19-05-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 582 K/Pdt.Sus/2011
Tanggal 25 Nopember 2011 — KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA REPUBLIK INDONESIA (KPPU-RI) vs 1. PT MULTIMAS NABATI ASAHAN, dkk
462544 Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
  • dijadikanpatokan (misalnya,sehubungan dengan perubahan di pasar, kenaikan harga bahan baku)belum dapat menjadi suatu bukti yang cukup adanya concerteda3practice.Dengan demikian jelas bahwa price leadership model bukanmerupakan bukti yang memadai untuk menentukan adanya penetapanharga atau kartel harga ;Bahwa selanjutnya dalam pembelaan Pemohon Keberatan telahmerujuk pada pada putusan ECJ kasus Wood Pulp, yangmembatalkan putusan Komisi Persaingan Eropa, menyatakan:In determining the probative value of those