Ditemukan 495 data
Urut Berdasarkan
Register : 15-03-2012 — Putus : 11-07-2013 — Upload : 06-08-2014
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 166/PDT.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Sel. Tanggal 11 Juli 2013 —
206 — 119
206 — 119
Commercial ArbitrationBoard").Bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 18.00 ayat (2) Distributorship Agreementtelah disepakati hal hal sebagai berikut:Pasal 18.00 Ayat (2) Distributorship Agreement:".. any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with thisAgreement or any breach hereof shall be settled finally by arbitration.The arbitration shall take place in Seoul, Korea and shall be conductedin accordance with the Rules of the Korean Commercial ArbitrationBoard by three arbitrators appointed according to those
Putus : 07-11-2017 — Upload : 28-12-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1834/B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 7 Nopember 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI VS PT PHILIP MORRIS INDONESIA
85 — 53 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
85 — 53 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
The royalty is payable to M irrespective ofwhether uses Ms ingredients or those from local suppliers;it is therefore not a condition of sale of the goods, and forvaluation purposes cannot be added by virtue of Article 8.1(c) to the price actually paid or payable;Berikut adalah terjemahannya:1. M produsen asing memiliki trademark yang dilindungi dinegara pengimpor.
Register : 10-01-2017 — Putus : 13-03-2017 — Upload : 18-04-2017
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 184 B/PK/PJK/2017 Tanggal 13 Maret 2017 — DIREKTUR JENDERAL PAJAK VS PT. FREEPORT INDONESIA;
65 — 45 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
65 — 45 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
theassociated enterprises are not arm'slength, and that the price in theuncontrolled transaction may need to besubstituted for the price in the controlledtransaction.2.14 Following the principles in Chapter, an uncontrolled transaction iscomparable to a controlled transaction(i.e. it is a comparable uncontrolledtransaction) for purposes of the CUPmethod if one of two conditions is met: a) none of the differences (if any)between the transactions beingcompared or between the enterprisesundertaking those
Register : 25-10-2016 — Putus : 15-06-2017 — Upload : 18-08-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 751 /Pdt.G/2016/PN JKT.Sel. Tanggal 15 Juni 2017 — PT TIMAS SUPLINDO,
Lawan
1. BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI),
2. LEIGHTON OFFSHORE Pte. Ltd,
494 — 321
494 — 321
International Commercial Arbitration 1985 WithAmendments as Adopted in 2006 ("UNCITRAL Model Law") (Bukti T213).Hal 80 dari 103 Hal Putusan No. 751/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Jkt.Selqualifications required of the arbitrator by the agreement ofthe parties and to such considerations as are likely tosecure the appointment of an independent and impartialarbitrator and, in the case of a sole or third arbitrator, shalltake into account as well the advisability of appointing anarbitrator of a nationality other than those
Putus : 16-05-2017 — Upload : 22-11-2018
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1275 K/PID.SUS/2016 Tanggal 16 Mei 2017 — KOSMAN VITONI IMMANUEL SIBORO
1143 — 2212 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
1143 — 2212 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
Doktrin Vicarious Liability(pertanggungjawaban pidana pengganti) bertolak dari doktrin respondeatsuperior yang berarti A master is liable in certain cases for the wrongfulacts of his servant, and a principal for those of his agent dimanadidasarkan pada employment principle yaitu bahwa majikan(employer) adalah penanggungjawab utama dari perbuatan paraburuh/karyawan.Bahwa terhadap hal sebagaimana disebut diatas haruslah didasarkanpada the delegation principle, yaitu menurut prinsip ini, a guiltymind
Register : 13-07-2017 — Putus : 14-02-2019 — Upload : 22-05-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 362/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Pst Tanggal 14 Februari 2019 — Penggugat melawan Tergugat
405 — 362
405 — 362
We further authorise you, if in your opinion the receiveddocuments and underlying goods then held by you as securityhereunder is deemed by you to be inadequate for all ouroutstanding liabilities to you (including but limited to those arisingunder or in connection with the Credit), to appropriate setoffand/or apply upon any and all of such liabilities, any and allmoneys now or hereafter with you on deposit or otherwisestanding to our credit or belonging to us and/or, in yourdiscretion, to hold any
Register : 10-11-2016 — Putus : 05-01-2017 — Upload : 20-02-2017
Putusan PN WAINGAPU Nomor 18/Pdt.G./2016/PN. Wgp. Tanggal 5 Januari 2017 — - PT Algae Sumba Timur Lestari
181 — 504
181 — 504
Wgp.not subject to price regulation, that was the onlypresent and future seller of those products in thatarea could impose a small but significant andnontransitory increase in price above prevailingor likely future levels Atau dengan kata lain,pasar bersangkutan diartikan sebagai suatu atausekelompok produk dan wilayah geografistertentu. dimana perusahaan tertentu yangdihipotetiskan mampu memaksimalkan profitkarena merupakan satusatunya penyedia yangberpotensi menaikkan harga secara kecil namunsignifikan
Putus : 02-07-2014 — Upload : 16-12-2014
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 25 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014 Tanggal 2 Juli 2014 — I. TEGUH HANDOYO, DK VS KAWAN KUSUMA SALIM
258 — 285 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
258 — 285 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
bercorak stare decisisdalam kasus yang sama, maka Pemohon Kasasi (dahulu Tergugat II) sangatberharap Mahkamah Agung pada peradilan kasasi mampu menyelesaikankontroversi dan disparitas yang melekat pada putusan tersebut, denganberdasarkan fungsi Mahkamah Agung yang ditentukan undangundang untukmenghilangkan kontroversi yang bersifat parsialitas dan disparitas bertitik tolakdari prinsip imparsialitas (impartiality) dan perlakuan yang sama dalam situasiyang sama atas kasus yang sama (equal treatment of those
Author : Yunus Husain (Penulis); M. Nur Solikhin (Tim Peneliti); Rizky Argama (Tim Peneliti), dkk;
Penjelasan Hukum tentang Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi 6439 — 10875
- Terdapat tiga ruang lingkup yang harus dipenuhi apabila ingin menerapkan perampasan aset tanpa pemidanaan dalam hal perkara tindak pidana korupsi, yakni:a. Tidak terdapat cukup bukti untuk membuktikan unsur-unsur pidana korupsi (putusan bebas tidak ... [Selengkapnya]
authorised officersuspects that the suspect committed theoffence; and(b) that the authorised officer suspects that thesuspect derived * literary proceeds inrelation to the offence; and(c) if the application is to restrain property of aperson other than the suspect but not torestrain * bankruptcy property of thesuspectthat the authorised officersuspects that the property is subject to the* effective control of the suspect.The affidavit must include the grounds on which the* authorised officer holds those
Putus : 12-04-2016 — Upload : 27-03-2017
Putusan PN SERANG Nomor 40/PDT.G/2015/PN SRG Tanggal 12 April 2016 — PERDATA
- PT. IGAS UTAMA
LAWAN
- PT. MAJUKO UTAMA INDONESIA, DKK
219 — 88
219 — 88
Statements of case which aresuitable fro striking out on ground (a) include those which raise anunwinnable case where continuance of the proceedings is withoutany possible benefit to the respondent and would waste resourceson both sides (Harris v. Bolt Burden 2000 L.T.L., February 2,2000,CA).
Register : 24-07-2009 — Putus : 30-06-2010 — Upload : 23-04-2015
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 280/PDT.G/2009/PN.JKT.PST Tanggal 30 Juni 2010 — ABD. KARIM,Cs >< BOEING COMPANY,Cs
267 — 102
267 — 102
(a) this attachment prescribes airworthiness standards for the issue of typecertificates and changes to those certificates, for aircraft engines.Terjemahannya:(a) Lampiran ini menetapkan standarstandar kelaikan terbang untukpenerbitan sertifikatsertifikat tipe dan perubahanperubahan terhadapsertifikatsertifikat tersebut, untuk mesinmesin pesawat terbang.Setelah memeriksa pesawat udara beserta komponennya termasuk mesinnyasecara menyeluruh dan teliti maka kemudian Ditjen Hubud akan mengeluarkandokumendokumen
Register : 23-01-2009 — Putus : 06-08-2009 — Upload : 18-10-2011
Putusan PTUN SEMARANG Nomor 04/G/2009/PTUN.Smg. Tanggal 6 Agustus 2009 — -BERRY NAHDIAN FORQAN DKK
-KEPALA KANTOR PELAYANAN PERIJINAN TERPADU KABUPATEN PATI
115 — 55
115 — 55
Statements of casewhich are suitable fro striking out on ground (a)include those which raise an unwinnable case wherecontinuance of the proceedings is without any possiblebenefit to the respondent and would waste resources onboth sides (Harris v. Bolt Burden 2000 L.T.L.,February 2, 2000,CA). A claim or defence may bestruct out as not being a valid claim or defence as amatter of law (Price Meats Ltd. v.
Register : 21-04-2014 — Putus : 10-08-2015 — Upload : 01-06-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 226/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Jkt.Sel Tanggal 10 Agustus 2015 — THERESIA PIPIT WIDOWATI (Orang tua dari MARC AAROON KROONEN, beralamat di Kencana Permai 8/3 Pondok Indah Jakarta Selatan, yang dalam hal ini memberikan kuasa kepada Prof Dr. O.C.Kaligis S.H.,M.H, NADYA HELIDA, S.H., M.H., CINTA INDAH K.P. TRISULO, S.H., DEWI EKUWI VINA, S.H, ISHEMAT SOERIA ALAM, S.H, PANGERAN BARON, S.H., Advokat-advokat dan/atau Penasihat Hukum, pada kantor hukum OTTO CORNELIS KALIGIS & Associates, beralamat di Jl. Majapahit 18-20, Kompleks Majapahit Permai Blok B 123, Jakarta Pusat, 10160, berdasarkan Surat Kuasa Khusus No. 117/SK.IV/2014 tertanggal 17 April 2014, untuk Selanjutnya disebut sebagai --- PENGGUGAT ;
M e l a w a n
1. YAYASAN JAKARTA INTERNASIONAL SCHOOL, yang beralamat di Jalan Terogong Raya No.33, Cilandak Raya, Jakarta Selatan, Selanjutnya disebut sebagai -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TERGUGAT I ;
2. KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA, beralamat di Jalan Raya Jenderal Sudirman Pintu I, Gedung D, Depdiknas Senayan, Jakarta 10270, Selanjutnya disebut sebagai ------------ TERGUGAT II ;
3. PT. ISS INDONESIA, suatu Perseroan terbatas yangt beralamat di Graha ISS, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Blok J No. 3 Bintaro Jaya 15229, sebagai -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TERGUGAT III ;
4. ISS A/S, suatu perusahaan yang didirikan berdasarkan hukum Negara Denmark, beralamat di Buddingevej 197 DK-2860, Soborg, Denmark sebagai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TERGUGAT IV ;
546 — 367
546 — 367
Those Specifications are an integral part of Contractorsobligations under this Contract.Terjemahan tersumpah dari Fatchurozak:RUANG LINGKUP PEKERJAANPihak Kontraktor (kursif kami: TERGUGAT Ill) akan menyediakanlayanan pembersihan dan pemeliharaan tanah serta kustodiansebagaimana diminta oleh JIS.Pihak Kontraktor (kursif kami: TERGUGAT Ill) juga menyediakan jasamanajemen, pelatinan, pengawasan, tenaga kerja, pakaian seragam,tanda pengenal, peralatan dan pasokan dalam upaya menyediakanlayanan yang
Register : 17-11-2017 — Putus : 07-08-2018 — Upload : 27-05-2019
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 625/Pdt.G/2017/PN Jkt.Pst Tanggal 7 Agustus 2018 — Penggugat:
PT INTERNUX
Tergugat:
PT HUAWEI TECH INVESTMENT,
303 — 118
PT INTERNUX
Tergugat:
PT HUAWEI TECH INVESTMENT,
303 — 118
The Parties hereby agree that the Parties shall continue to performall the contractual obligations pursuant to this Contract pending thefinalization of the arbitration save and except those disputed obligationsreferred to the arbitration.Terjemahannya dalam Bahasa Indonesia:PASAL 15Penyelesaian SengketaSetiap sengketa yang timbul berdasarkan Perjanjian ini atau yangterkait dengan Perjanjian, termasuk sengketa mengenai keabsahanatau keberadaan Perjanjian, wajib diselesaikan secara musyawarahmufakat
Putus : 16-04-2014 — Upload : 17-06-2015
Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1927 K/Pdt/2013 Tanggal 16 April 2014 — STANDARD CHARTERED BANK, CABANG JAKARTA VS PT. TOBU INDONESIA STEEL
145 — 101 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
145 — 101 — Berkekuatan Hukum Tetap
It is fordiscussion purposes only and does not constitute any offer,recommendation or solicitation to any person to enter into anytransaction or adopt any hedging, trading or investment strategy,nor does it contitute any prediction of likely future movements inrates or prices or any representation that any such futuremovements wil not exceed those shown in any illustration".Yang terjemahan bebasnya adalah:"Dokumen ini dikeluarkan oleh Standard Chartered Bank (Thai)(SCB) dan berisikan petunjuk mengenai
Register : 27-01-2016 — Putus : 13-12-2016 — Upload : 02-05-2018
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 42/PDT.G/2016/PN JKT.SEL Tanggal 13 Desember 2016 — PT. VERSACON MEDICAL
Lawan
1.CARL ZEISS Pte Ltd
2.KEPALA PERWAKILAN dari KANTOR PERWAKILAN CARL ZEISS Pte Ltd
3.PT. ELO KARSA UTAMA
293 — 180
293 — 180
Installation and service will take taken care by ZEISS (Newdistribution/logistic partner) engineers (except for those instancewhere PTV already has a service agreement), but PTV is willing tosupport ZEISS whenever needed. Service quotation for all the orderswill be handled by our new distribution/logistic partner. Tanggapan Penggugat : AGREED." Terjemahnya:"Setelah berdiskusi panjang kita sepakat akan halhal berikut ini :1.
Register : 14-03-2019 — Putus : 10-07-2019 — Upload : 10-07-2019
Putusan PT JAKARTA Nomor 184/PDT/2019/PT DKI Tanggal 10 Juli 2019 — Pembanding/Penggugat : SERIKAT PEKERJA PT. JAKARTA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. JAKARTA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. PELABUHAN INDONESIA II, Persero
Terbanding/Tergugat III : HUTCHISON PORT JAKARTA PTE, LTD
187 — 147
Terbanding/Tergugat I : PT. JAKARTA INTERNATIONAL CONTAINER TERMINAL
Terbanding/Tergugat II : PT. PELABUHAN INDONESIA II, Persero
Terbanding/Tergugat III : HUTCHISON PORT JAKARTA PTE, LTD
187 — 147
Statements of case which aresuitable fro striking out on ground (a) include those which raise anunwinnable case where continuance of the proceedings Is without anypossible benefit to the respondent and would waste resources on bothsides (Harris v. Bolt Burden 2000 L.T:L., February 2, 2000,CA). Aclaim or defence may be struct out as not being a valid claim ordefence as a matter of law (Price Meats Ltd. v.
Register : 26-03-2013 — Putus : 09-06-2015 — Upload : 29-02-2016
Putusan PN JAKARTA PUSAT Nomor 136/PDT.G/2013/PN.JKT.PST Tanggal 9 Juni 2015 — TINY TANTONO,Cs >< PACIFIC HARBOR ADVISORS PTE LTD,Cs
481 — 279
481 — 279
Guarantor, Clauses 16.2(a) and (b)(Status), 16.3 (Powers and authority), 16.5(b) (Nonconfiict),16.5(c) (Nonconlfict) but only in so far as it relates to Subsidiaries,16.8 (Financial statements), 16.11 (b) and (c) (Assets) and 16.15(Environmental matters); and16.3 Powers and authorityIt has the power to enter into and perform, and has taken allnecessary action to authorize the entry into and performance ofthe Finance Documents to which it is or will be a party and thetransactions contemplated bv those
Putus : 09-12-2016 — Upload : 08-03-2017
Putusan PN LUBUK PAKAM Nomor 28/Pdt.G/2016/PN Lbp Tanggal 9 Desember 2016 — Koperasi Serba Usaha ASPERINDO Sumatera Utara, dalam hal ini diwakili oleh Pengurus yaitu Riama Karlina, S.E., Ir. Baharuddin Berutu, Drs. Suhendy Pasaribu, masing-masing sebagai Ketua, Sekretaris dan Bendahara Koperasi tersebut, berkedudukan di Jalan Brigadir Jenderal Katamso No. 288-A, Kelurahan Sungai Mati, Kecamatan Medan Maimun, Kota Medan;
M E L A W A N :
1. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia cq. Kementerian Perhubungan RI cq. Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Udara Kementerian Perhubungan RI, cq. Direktorat Bandar Udara, cq Kepala Kantor Otoritas Bandar Udara Wilayah II, berkedudukan di Jalan Bandara Internasional Kualanamu â Medan, Desa Beringin, Kecamatan Beringin, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Propinsi Sumatera Utara, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT I ;
2. PT. Angkasa Pura II (Persero) Cabang Bandar Udara Internasional Kualanamu, berkedudukan di Jalan Bandara Internasional Kualanamu - Medan, Desa Beringin, Kecamatan Beringin, Kabupaten Deli Serdang, Propinsi Sumatera Utara, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT II;
3. PT. Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Cabang Medan, berkedudukan di Jalan Mongonsidi No. 34A, Kota Medan, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT III;
4. PT. Lion Air Cabang Medan, berkedudukan di Jalan Brigadir Jenderal Katamso No. 808 Kota Medan, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT IV ;
5. PT. Batik Air Cabang Medan, berkedudukan di Jalan Brigadir Jenderal Katamso No. 808 Kota Medan, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT V ;
6. PT. Sriwijaya Air Cabang Medan, berkedudukan di Jalan Gajah Mada No. 3 C-D Kota Medan, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT VI ;
7. PT. City Link Cabang Medan, berkedudukan di Grand Angkasa Hotel
Jl. Sutomo No. 1, Kota Medan, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT VII ;
8. PT. Indonesia Air Asia Cabang Medan, berkedudukan di Garuda Plaza Hotel Lobby Level, Jalan Sisingamangaraja No. 18 Kota Medan, selanjutnya disebut TERGUGAT VIII ;
123 — 15
123 — 15
Statements of case which are suitable fro striking outOn ground (a) include those which raise an unwinnable case wherecontinuance of the proceedings is without any possible benefit to therespondent and would waste resources on both sides (Harris v. BoltBurden 2000 L.T.L., February 2, 2000,CA). A claim or defence may bestruct out as not being a valid claim or defence as a matter of law (PriceMeats Ltd. v.
Register : 27-12-2016 — Putus : 27-04-2017 — Upload : 20-06-2017
Putusan PN JAKARTA SELATAN Nomor 907/Pdt.G.KPPU/2016/PN JKT.SEL Tanggal 27 April 2017 — - PT. COSL INDO
- PT. HUSKY â CNOOC Madura Limited
Lawan
KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU)
407 — 609
407 — 609
SIUPAL License : SIUPAL is not requiredduring bidding process.As stated in the Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan RI No.PM 10 Tahun 2014, regarding Procedures and Bidder shall provideLicensing Requirement for the Use of Foreign Ships for JackUP Drilling Rig andOther Activities that Do Not Include the Activities of fulfill all prevailingTransporting Passengers and/or Goods in the government regulationDomestic Sea Activities. regarding the flagging.SIUPAL Lincense only applies to those Companies Please
BidderContractualseeks Clarification concerningrequirement for proposed JUDrilling Rig Services Contract.Would Company accept to delete thisArticle in its entirely as Contractor does notaccept form of LD forany Delays,especially for those which are beyondContractor's reasonable control?